Breaking News
Home / Constitution / Exclusive: Legislation Introduced to End Illegal Drone Spying

Exclusive: Legislation Introduced to End Illegal Drone Spying

Two Washington state bills that protect residents from illegal drone surveillance in the public and private sector are quickly gaining large bi-partisan support.

Image: Aeryon Scout (Wikimedia Commons).

The first bill, HB 1771, not only prohibits the acquisition of unmanned aerial vehicles by government agencies without prior approval by the state legislature, but also protects residents by requiring law enforcement to obtain warrants for any drone surveillance. Originally introduced last year, the bill’s popularity has grown with Republican and Democrat sponsors.

“We’ve been working collaboratively across the isle to address some of the concerns raised over the last year,” Rep. David Taylor (R), the bill’s primary sponsor, told Storyleak. “The bill will protect the citizens of Washington from warrantless surveillance using UAVs.”

The bill also protects citizens who may inadvertently be captured by a drone’s camera during warranted use, requiring that any and all identifying information be deleted within twenty-four hours.

“No personal information collected on an individual or area other than the target that justified the issuance of a search warrant may be used, copied, or disclosed for any purpose. Such personal information shall be deleted as soon as possible, and in no event later than twenty-four hours after collection,” Section 11 of the bill reads.

According to the legislation, law enforcement would also be required to conduct yearly comprehensive audits on all drone operations. The audits, which would be made available to the public, would include copies of all warrants, the law enforcement log book and any corresponding emergency telephone calls.

The second bill, HB 2178, gives the same protection to Washington residents from private drone usage as well. Any individual with a reasonable expectation of privacy must give consent before being filmed by any privately owned drone.

“Prohibits operation of an unmanned aircraft in Washington airspace if the unmanned aircraft has active sensory devices onboard that collect personal information about any individual without the individual’s consent,” the bill’s summary reads. The bill also establishes “a private right of action for an individual whose reasonable expectation of privacy is violated.”

While both bills grow in popularity among surveillance-weary residents, aerospace giant Boeing as well as the Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs remain likely opponents. While Boeing successfully lobbied the Democratic leadership to reject drone regulation last year, Democrats have now jumped on board, likely responding to public pressure.

A leaked email also revealed a Washington lawmaker’s attempt to hide a drone demonstration from the public last March, citing fear over “demonstrations and security” issues.

Others such as industry lobbyist Paul Applewhite attempted to derail the legislation as well, shockingly advocating for “lethal force” within the United States during a House Committee hearing last February.

Despite the minor hiccup last year, residents did successfully end the Seattle Police Department’s attempts to use surveillance drones, forcing the department to return two drones to their vendor.

With the Obama administration attempting to assassinate yet another American overseas, the public’s support of drones may be shifting. Given different police departments’ vocal support for adding “rubber bullets and tear gas” to UAVs, few Americans are willing to wait and see how far the government is willing to take armed drones.

As experts predict the arrival of more than 30,000 drones over US skies by 2020, constitutional lawmakers are desperately working to restrain the government’s attempts at indiscriminate drone use.

Supporters of these bills are encouraged to contact members of the Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs to politely demand they support constitutional drone guidelines.

Phone: (360) 486-2380

Executive Director:
Legislative Director:
Executive Assistant:

Share Button

About Mikael Thalen

Mikael Thalen is an investigative journalist covering foreign policy, information security and digital surveillance. His reports have been cited by sites such as the New York Times, Computerworld, International Business Times and the Drudge Report. How to contact Mikael securely:

Check Also

Software Flaw Exposed Facebook Moderators’ Info to Suspected Terrorists

A flaw in software used by Facebook to moderate offensive content exposed more than 1,000 ...


  1. Include this as well for the globalist tyrant want to be's! ‘The day we fight back’: 6,000 websites protest surveillance, honor Aaron Swartz February 11, 2014

    More than 6,000 websites, including Reddit, Tumblr, Mozilla, are taking part in an online protest against government surveillance. The action marks two years since website blackouts against SOPA and PIPA and commemorates Aaron Swartz’s death.

    The February 11 online protest, going by the title ‘The Day We Fight Back’, is supposed to see around 6, 200 websites each host a large banner at the top reading “Dear internet, we’re sick of complaining about the NSA. We want new laws that curtail online surveillance.”

  2. Is this thing really expected to pass? I hope it does, but considering that the EU is spending over $400m on secret drone project –>
    I dont know how it will play out.

  3. If it is illegal why are they doing it and is it going to court? Are they part of the Trial Lawyer wing of the Two party Cartel by chance? We saw this act and performance in the late 1970's. Change and shakedown America? Here is your sign!

  4. This answers a lot of questions about drones.
    They aren't for civilian use, they aren't for anything practical.

    Once more, the dictatorship gathers steam and steals our freedoms and liberties.

  5. Superb article.This time, we got the following Fagin's end crossword puzzle clue.In this time we are help you for "Hang 'Em High" prop,Threat for a Wild West outlaw;The necktie in a necktie party, crosswords solution.Thanks.

  6. Aw, this was the actually quality publish. In theory Let me create like this as well??§o? spending time as well as actual effort to make a great post! however so what can I say! We procrastinate a lot and in no way seem to obtain some thing carried out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *