US Taxpayers Paying for Illegal British Spying

August 2nd, 2013
Updated 08/02/2013 at 5:21 am

The American taxpayer is footing the bill for illegal electronic surveillance efforts being conducted by Her Majesty’s government. These efforts appear to violate both the United States Constitution and British law.

gchq-spying-americansIt has been discovered that the National Security Agency paid its British counterpart, the Government Communications Headquarters, or GCHQ, $151 million (£100 million) for electronic surveillance over the past few years. These efforts included Global Telecoms Exploitation in which GCHQ tapped into fiber optic cables that gave them the ability to monitor international emails and phone calls. The Guardian newspaper reported on these items in the latest of NSA leaks.

British Spying on US Citizens for NSA

The Guardian pointed out that GCHQ might be spying on American citizens in the United States, which would be a direct violation of U.S. law. That would be a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which as Anthony Gucciardi has pointed out is already being ignored by the DHS.

British critics are concerned about this because it is an interference in Britain’s political system and status as an independent country. Documents Edward Snowden supplied to The Guardian indicate that GCHQ spent more time trying to satisfy demands from the NSA than from Her Majesty’s government. GCHQ was devoting its efforts to servicing its American customers rather than serving the British people whom it is supposed to protect.

In other words, the NSA might actually be violating British sovereignty on some level by directly funding some British government activities. What’s worse is that those activities seem to be directed at making an end run around the U.S. Constitution.

Snowden: British Spies ‘Worse Than NSA’

Snowden didn’t let the NSA off the hook; he told The Guardian that he thinks GCHQ is actually worse than the NSA. He believes GCHQ is more likely to violate the law and rights than the NSA is.

Even though it is a democratic country, Britain has no written Constitution. That makes it easier for British government organizations to operate outside the law. Since GCHQ is based in Britain and it is not operating under the US Constitution, it may be used by the NSA to go ‘around’ the Constitution. Although any U.S. government agency that received data from such an operation would be violating the Fourth Amendment.

Naturally the notion raises the troubling possibility that the NSA is illegally spying on British subjects (citizens) possibly in violation of British law on behalf of GCHQ. In other words, the rights of citizens of both nations are being violated. The Guardian also unearthed documents that show GCHQ has an objective of being able to exploit any phone anywhere anytime. Exploit is a euphemism for tap or hack. The goal is to be able to monitor all mobile phones and apps.

It looks like the NSA’s surveillance efforts are larger and more troublesome than was previously revealed. This agency is not only a threat to our privacy, but it is poisoning our relations with other countries in the name of national security.

Congress and the British Parliament need to start doing their jobs and hold agencies and their officials accountable for their behavior. There have probably been massive payments by the NSA to other governments we aren’t aware of. There’s no telling what foreign governments are listening to your telephone calls and reading your emails with the NSA’s help.

Share Button

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Privacy

About the Author ()

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Thanks for circulating.I actually realise it that you distributed with us such informative

  2. Buy Ibeacons says:

    I always thought everything I truly do on the internet and in my mobile phone has become followed coming from day time one. It will require an actual naïve person to consentrate the govt isn't really likely to observe ones just about every move when it is simple to collect the information done to you.

  3. fred09red says:

    People should choose carefully their legal advisers and them consult them before making any important step in their lives – an investment, signing a contract, and so on., for instance, have been introducing the service area they work in explicitly enough so that the public would which is the relevant and reliable representative for their particular problem.

  4. sashio says:

    Taxpayers will never really know where their money are going to. There are many things that the government is hiding from the public eye and some of them it is better to stay hidden in order not to create chaos. It is better for a citizen to try to stay as informed as he can. No matter if he is choosing the T1 internet providers for their online information or certain TV channels.

  5. sodesoh says:

    People, as tax payers, should be better informed on where their money payed in taxes are going. Seeking advice from an accountant would be a good idea in this case, for better monitoring what your expenses are. There are management tools nowdays that financial experts use, like this one here, that is created by accountants with the purpose of better serving their clients. Even if you're not a bussiness owner, you can still benefit from the advantages of these services.

  6. Jhonny says:

    Excellent Post Daniel !

  7. cartoons says:

    Documents Edward Snowden supplied to The Guardian indicate that GCHQ spent more time trying to satisfy demands from the NSA than from Her Majesty’s government. GCHQ was devoting its efforts to servicing its American customers rather than serving the British people whom it is supposed to protect.

  8. esay writer says:

    The most of the writers are the write the essays to the contains the good quality essays and the good orders essays for the proper essays should be the making the good essays writer writing services.

  9. Rob says:

    Why use an online accountant? I can answer your query easily, as I have been using their services since years, and they have never let me feel disappointed.

  10. Simon Harrison says:

    This is a great read and an interesting piece that I enjoyed reading. We would also like to share this great firm of Cheaper Accountants who I have used for a number of years now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *