Pat Buchanan: Chemical Attack ‘Reeks Of False Flag Operation’

August 31st, 2013
Updated 08/31/2013 at 12:26 pm

During an interview with Newsmax Thursday, three-time presidential adviser Pat Buchanan joined the growing number of mainstream voices now specifically labeling the recent chemical attacks in Syria as a false flag.

“…First, this thing reeks of a false flag operation,” said Buchanan. “I would not understand or comprehend that Bashar al-Assad, no matter how bad a man he may be, would be so stupid as to order a chemical weapons attack on civilians in his own country when the immediate consequence of which might be that he would be at war with the United States. So this reeks of a false flag operation.”

See the video below:

Throughout the course of the Syrian conflict, the Obama administration and its western allies have continually failed at their attempts to bring down the Assad government. Despite the administration’s claims of an “undeniable” Assad chemical attack, US officials have continued to cast doubt on the evidence.

Evidence pointing to a rebel-backed false flag chemical attack to blame Assad has continued to pile up as public approval for a Syrian intervention crumbles. Not only did the British parliament vote down the Cameron government’s attempts to intervene militarily, A Reuters poll from earlier this week found that 91 percent of Americans oppose military air strikes.

Prominent Figures Label Syria Attacks ‘False Flag’

Just last Thursday, Al-Qaeda-backed Syrian rebels admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they had carried out the chemical attacks after being supplied the weapons from Saudi Arabia. The information backs up comments made by Syria’s deputy foreign minister as well as multiple YouTube videos showing the US funded rebels launching chemical attacks with “Saudi factory” labeled weapons.

Ron Paul’s statement calling the chemical attacks a false flag while on Fox News last Wednesday has seemingly opened the flood gates for other journalists to come forward with their similar findings. During an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News Friday, photojournalist Jonathan Alpeyrie, who was kidnapped and held captive by Syrian rebels for 81 days last April, said he also believed the recent chemical attack was a rebel backed false flag operation.

This coincides with the fact that Obama is now publicly on the same side as Al-Qaeda, as Anthony Gucciardi has broken down:

While the mainstream media has ridiculed and almost completely ignored the historical reality of false flag operations, prominent voices within the alternative news have now forced the term into the public narrative. The power structure has begun to panic from what they themselves have deemed the “global political awakening.” Powerful documentary films have been incremental tools in relaying information to the public on historical examples of state-sponsored terror.

Share Button

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Mainstream media, War

About the Author ()

Mikael is the lead features writer at His articles have been featured on sites such as the Drudge Report, Infowars and Natural News. During his time at, he was frequently ranked the number one political writer.

Comments (12)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. anonymous says:

    One more speaking out!!

  2. Econman says:

    Operation Northwoods & 9/11 all over again.

    • Chris Condon says:

      When will prominent Americans stand up and say frankly that the official version of the September 11 attacks makes no sense and that we need a new investigation. It can't happen soon enough for me.

  3. Jerry McGlothlin says:

    With all these false flags we know about, it kind of makes you wonder how many we don't know about?

  4. Jerry McGlothlin says:

    What if it were Syria launching Cruise Missiles on NY and DC as a 'limited strike' to punish us for the way the IRS treated Tea Party Groups or for how we treat our Native Americans or how we abort our pre-born U.S. citizens?…

    • Will says:

      The US government/military intentionally dumped radioactive dust and deadly chemicals on St. Louis neighborhoods from 1953-1964 just to see what would happen. I wonder what country Obama thinks should invade us for going against "70 years of international norms". Personally, I pick Russia.

      • Yes, Russia has displayed a higher level of competency than the White House Administration in the last few years. I think this new superpower has the interests of humanity at it's very heart – the KGB. I fully trust our Russian warlords to investigate us and jail whomever they may deem necessary. Who stands with me?

  5. Dean says:

    Remember the Maine!

  6. Frank says:

    Don't forget the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the USS Liberty attack.

  7. Nancy says:

    This attack has nothing to do with humanitarian concerns. It has everything to do with regime change. It's a stopover on our way to Iran. What about the poor children of Iran, when (according to recently released CIA documents) we were complicit in Saddam's use of poison gas on Iranians back in the eighties, when we were doing business with him? Did we ever use Agent Orange? Did we ever use white phosphorus? Who holds us accountable?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *