Breaking News
Home / Global / MIT Professor Exposes Climate Change Hysteria

MIT Professor Exposes Climate Change Hysteria

A leading climate change figure has come out against the government’s continued and ridiculous climate change hysteria.

Speaking in regards to Massachusetts’ new $50 million climate change proposal, MIT Professor Richard Lindzen, a leading figure in the climate change movement, pointed out the absurdity of blaming every weather event on global warming and climate change.

“The changes that have occurred due to global warning are too small to account for,” Lindzen told WBZ-TV. “It has nothing to do with global warming, it has to do with where we live.”

Although supporting the theory of man-made global warming, Lindzen admitted that rhetoric from the political class and green movement has been nothing more than over-the-top “catastrophism.”

“Even many of the people who are supportive of sounding the global warning alarm, back off from catastrophism,” Lindzen said. “It’s the politicians and the green movement that like to portray catastrophe.”

Even more surprising, Lindzen goes on to point out the government’s obvious use of climate change alarmism to push greater state control, even warning over politicians’ use of “crony capitalism.”

“Global warming, climate change, all these things are just a dream come true for politicians. The opportunities for taxation, for policies, for control, for crony capitalism are just immense, you can see their eyes bulge,” Lindzen said.

Lindzen has frequently been attacked by climate alarmists for refusing to give into political pressures regarding climate sThe growing number of failed predictions from the global warming crowd has only cooled the public’s belief in recent years.

From 2007 to 2009, Al Gore hysterically warned that the North Pole would be completely “ice-free” by 2013. Instead, 2013 experienced record breaking cold and major growth in Arctic ice.

Similarly, Gore made desperate warnings over the danger of increased hurricanes during the same time period. Soon after, climate scientists had trouble explaining the record low hurricanes that soon followed.

In his 1992 book “Earth in the Balance,” Gore went on to claim that global warming would soon wipe coastal areas of Florida off the map in as little as a few decades. Sea level statistics taken 18 years later revealed Gore’s predictions to be completely inaccurate.

White House Science Adviser John P. Holdren, who made failed predictions of global cooling in his 1977 book Ecoscience, attempted to blame the recent “polar vortex” on global warming. Researchers soon uncovered a 1974 Time Magazine article that blamed a cold polar vortex on global cooling instead.

Climate change alarmists have become so crazed in their beliefs that some have attempted to equate skepticism with racism, claiming any denial of global warming is a “sickness” in need of “treatment.”

Unsurprisingly, major environmental issues such as the ongoing Fukushima nuclear disaster seem to be completely ignored by Gore and company. Given the massive amount of money Al Gore has continued to make from generating climate fear, it seems unlikely that any real disaster unable to generate cash will receive proper attention.

Share Button

About Mikael Thalen

Mikael Thalen is an investigative journalist covering foreign policy, information security and digital surveillance. His reports have been cited by sites such as the New York Times, Computerworld, International Business Times and the Drudge Report. How to contact Mikael securely: https://keybase.io/mikaelthalen

Check Also

White House Releases Secret Memo Justifying Drone Assassination of Americans

In response to several lawsuits, the Obama administration released a Department of Justice memo Monday that explains the the President's justification for killing Americans via drone without a trial.

661 comments

  1. I wonder if that ship full of global warming activists was ever freed from all that summer ice

  2. Did that ship carrying all those global warming activists ever get rescued from summer ice?

  3. Did they ever rescue Rogers ship?

    • It sunk in the steaming, boiling Arctic ocean. The people swam to an iceberg but it melted.

    • Amazing. You're amazing. You have that same magnetism I have that Roger can't seem to ignore. Me thinks you're on to his every move. =)

      • Did you rub tuna on your face or something?

        I just can't imagine why the flies are buzzing around you so much….?

        • You are vile.

          • And of course you overlook everything any troll from your posse says.

          • First, she isn't a troll.
            Second, she isn't in my posse.

            I remember the original "pose".
            It was the original Rogers Rangers.

            Roger, HPDuuuh, ForConstipation, Looking4HisSanity, Falcon, and a few other misguided miscreants.

          • Yes she is a troll. Second those trolls that work together are the loose and you are still not remembering anything.

        • Have you ever had tuna rubbed on your face?

        • Isn't it a bit fool-hardy to be the person initiating a lawsuit based on what you consider an offensive comment made to you, all the while you do the exact same thing, especially to me? Seems pretty obvious every single word you've posted since filing your lawsuit on January 14, 2014, will be used to prove you're not exactly the one who takes the high road, and yet you continue to spew your filth at me comment after comment, day after day. Short of deleting your IntenseDebate account, how are you going to cover your ass on this and try to play the victim card? And if your attorney hasn't told you to keep your 'stashioed pie hole shut, you need a new attorney — and fast.

          • Nope, the comments are on totally different levels.

            Ask wee.

            And I return your insults in kind, if you knew how to behave and act civilly you would find that in my comments to you too.

          • It seems you hate women. Why?

          • I have no use for angry bitter cranky people, she happens to be a woman.

          • Why didn't you answer my question?

          • You answered why it seems you hate women? Can you send me a link to that?

          • I have no use for angry bitter cranky people. Poof just happens to be a woman.

            She certainly is no lady.

          • So no link? Okay, I'll write it off as another one of your lies.

          • So, I'm still not impressed with your reason for needing one.

          • As a man, why do you think I am trying to impress you? This isn't one of "those" sites.

          • Still looking for more spam to meet your quota?

          • If I was looking for spam, I sure came to the right person.

          • Yes the posse of trolls lurk everyplace i post, until they all get banned from the site that is.

          • Hmmm…aren't YOU banned from a few sites, Rogie?

          • Aren't you just behaving like scum at a lot of sites?

          • 46 more trash comments to go

          • Good, then you might get the rest of the afternoon off.

          • 30 to go spammer boy

          • And here you are struggling to keep up.

          • Are you afraid or embarrassed to answer my simple question? Aren't YOU banned from a few sites?

          • Are you afraid or embarrassed to answer my simple question? Aren't YOU acting badly on a few sites?

          • It's very clear that I asked first, the ball's in your court. Aren't YOU banned from a few sites?

          • And I tossed it back at you.

            Aren't you acting badly on a few sites?

          • Aren't YOU banned from a few sites? Or are you too BRAWK BRAWK to answer me?

          • Aren't you acting badly on a few sites? Or are you so lacking in manners that you won't slow the broom down enough to answer me?

          • Obsessed with her, aren't you, you mealy-mouthed dhlt-muffin?

          • Nailed it.

          • Isn't that a shocker the two posse trolls are pulling together.

            Too bad you have nothing to actually push and advocate for….

          • You should take some time and go back and read the comments you've made to me the past 10+ weeks and my responses — you really should (did you want the permalinks I've saved? haha!). Just a hunch, but I suspect every single one of them will come back to haunt you. I've read your lawsuit — in order to have suffered the damages you're claiming, you'd have to prove that you're a good writer…your 155,000+ comments will prove that you're not. Paying a 'publisher' to print your book will prove that no 'real' publisher will touch your stuff. Pehh — my only interest in the whole thing is to watch in amusement. BUT It's really hard to claim you've been damaged in some way when your actions — your written words — will be your downfall.

            You seem to think that you're mentally superior to everyone who comments here, but a word of caution/advice: Take copies of your last 1,000 pages of comments to your attorney, have him read them, then ask him if perhaps those comments represent a very real threat to your hoped-for victory in court. Your attorney knows that should Wee prevail, all costs will be coming out of your pocket, and those costs can't be dismissed by filing bankruptcy. I think you've cooked your own goose.

          • You need to read the court decision on this case.

            Vigorous debate is protected, it seems you think you're just more stubborn and bitter than everyone else here.
            http://verdict.justia.com/2011/11/29/an-illinois-

          • On the facts of my case, it will be laid out in court, not here with some ill mannered shrew who really doesn't have any skin in the game.

          • You're gonna prevail in this, Rog — I can feel it in my bones. http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k39/lilmayfield

          • Oh, and keep on keepin' on — you KNOW my caution/advice is spot-on, but you just keep digging your hole a little deeper….I've noticed you're using a backhoe now instead of a shovel. To quote myself, "…your actions — your written words — will be your downfall."

          • Time will tell. It wasn't long that you discounted the entire thing.

          • Discounted? No, I didn't discount it, I scoffed at it. You don't have a snowball's chance in hell of prevailing (I've read the lawsuit). Right now you have 154,893 bits of evidence that prove you suffered no actual damages because those bits prove you lack the prowess to be taken seriously as an author — just look at your last sentence in your comment, you left out a word.

            Face facts, Roger — you've been burning bridges across the internet forum 'scene' for years, WAY before I ever entered the picture. I've found conservative forums where no one is allowed to even mention your name. From what I can tell, you made a fool of yourself on probably the most famous (infamous?) forum of all, Breitbart — sounds to me like that was a long time ago, but you're remembered…not in a good way. And the more you comment, the deeper you dig your own hole. As I said before, if your attorney is so inept they haven't warned you to shut your pie-hole, you need to hire a different attorney because the one you have is playing you like a cheap fiddle — something you're used to here.

          • You go ahead, but I think of odds of my prevailing are much better than the odds of you ever becoming well mannered and discovering the joys of civil discourse.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Poof just humiliated you.

            Where can I get a copy of the lawsuit. I need a good laugh.

          • He humiliates himself. Poof just points it out.

          • Then she gets out the bug spray to deal with the flies buzzing around her.

            You posse of trolls can't help yourselves, the group sure does try to protect each other from the obvious failings in your spa,.

          • Let's be real here, Roger — do I ever make comments regarding your personal hygiene or the lack thereof? Nope. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

            BTW, it's always so hilarious to watch as you snag other people's shtick — you've glommed onto "Obot" on that birther site where you've resorted to your standard, "you're a troll/part of the posse" crap. You can't even come up with a decent insult on your own.

          • Let's be real. When do you ever make a comment not insulting me personally? Something about a dog humping your leg comes to mind, do you want me to quote you again?

            And if you want to be an ill mannered shrew that's your business. But don't expect me to treat you with kid gloves when you do.

          • How are you NOT like a nasty little unneutered chihuahua humping someone's leg? You're a damn stalker/humper. You can figuratively be sprayed with a hose, drop-kicked across the room, swatted on the nose with a newspaper, and you just keep coming back and coming back. When I was in kindergarten I and all of my little classmates learned that when someone doesn't want to play with you, leave them alone. Pretty simple stuff, but obviously you missed that lesson when you were 5 years old.

            On a side note, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts your [ambulance chasing] attorney has said very succinctly to you, 'GET THE F**K OFF THE INTERNET AND STAY OFF'. I'm right about that, you and I both know it.

          • How are you not like a nasty old hag with a bitter hatred for everyone that thinks on their own?

            You are a harridan and pretend you're credible enough to do the drop kicking and spraying, that means you deserve the comments pointing that out.

            You really don't understand how you appear to anyone who's dealt with a angry troll who can't see past the hate.

          • Spa? This isn't one of those bath houses nor one of "those" sites where that discussion in appropriate.

          • spa, is one key stroke away from spam.

            You know like when you posted this:

            4 hours ago @ Speak Out America – Speak Out America · 2 replies · +2 points
            Good Lordk, yu can't eve spell "are" rigtht.

          • I was wondering about 'spa' myself. I'm trying to cut him some slack today, I can tell he's moving toward melt-down again and you KNOW how ugly that gets.

          • It wasn't spa it was spa,

            You know like when your posse troll said this:

            10 hours ago @ Speak Out America – Speak Out America · 2 replies · +2 points
            Good Lordk, yu can't eve spell "are" rigtht.

          • Oh, OK, now I get it.

            "It wasn't spa it was spa,"

            Thanks for clearing up THAT mystery. *wink*

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            HAHAHHA!!

          • Did you do that all on your own?

            Wow, it's like you're almost smarter than the average troll.

          • Yes, I think the big words still confused you though.

          • 29 to go little boy

          • Don't talk to yourself when you're spamming. It's different out from under the bridge in the real world.

          • Poof tried and it didn't work for the reasons I explained.

            But of course the posse does stick together.

            And you probably have a copy already, if you can just talk to the right character inside your head to tell you where they hid it.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            I don't have it. I want to know why your book is part of the lawsuit, because I was planning on suing for the mental damages I have after reading that s h it.

          • I have a copy in PDF format if you're interested.

          • Just don't ask him to provide a valid email address, unless they have them behind communist chinese ISP's.

          • He's as capable as anyone else of opening a burner account long enough to get an email from me with the lawsuit attached. I doubt he's too concerned about it.

          • I doubt if you can manage his email accounts, but that won't stop you from trying.

            You remind me of a joke about a dyke that had to kick start her vibrator to prove she was in charge of everything.

          • You do know email addresses don't care about ISPs, right?

          • You do know that someone so cowardly that they hide behind fake ISP's and Chinese servers that they won't want emails tossed around?

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Can you upload it to drop box and post the link?

          • And then can you ask Wee for his demand letter?

          • I've never even heard of a drop box, but I can sure try as long as it doesn't open me up to more stalking from him.

          • Oh poof, what's wrong?

            Is the broom in the shop getting some dry rot taken off?

          • You recognize that makes no sense, right? Is a puddle beginning to form under your melt-down chair? Thought so.

          • You recognize that if you didn't act like a post menopausal hag then it might make sense?

          • 43 more trash comments to go

          • Then will they let you back under the bridge?

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Then the next time Roger is off line, I'll send you my email.

          • Sounds good. He generally leaves around 2pm for several hours. He's sooo predictable.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Ok, I got it. Thanks. Reading it now.

          • My pleasure. It's a pretty fast read since a good chunk of it is repetitious….mostly John Doe garbage.

          • Yes, legal tactics that only make sense to winners in court.

          • 42 more trash comments to go

          • You can do it, just repeat yourself a lot.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Holy s h it.l I have never read anything funnier than this lawsuit.

            You are suing me for saying you pee sitting down?

            HAHAHHAHAHAH

            Still reading it.

          • Then why not call the lawyer and ask for the demand letter?

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            What for?

          • You seem to be curious all of a sudden about the litigation.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You are curious about cock.

            Don't worry, I don't really want Wee's demand letter.

          • Still the deviant sexual stalker?

            I'm not interested.

          • 44 more trash comments to go

          • You still can't count that high?

          • 27 to go, got to go and eat.
            Have a happy spamming time.

          • I was hoping they didn't give you more than you could handle, I guess they did.

          • So, it's not garbage and you know there is no explaining what your comments have been.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            I not interested in Wee's demand letter.
            I am having too much fun reading this lawsuit. F u ck it's funny.

            You lawyer should be disbarred for stealing your money.

          • You're a fool then.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You have never peed sitting down?

            You will have to prove that in court. HAHAHHAH!!!

          • Still trying to figure out if you made any small mistakes when you bounced off of those Chinese servers?

            Dont' blame me for you oops moments.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Will you be demotrating how you pee in front of the judge? HAHAHHAAHAHH!

          • Still the deviant sexual stalker trying for personal information?

            I'm not interested.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Thye judge will laugh you out of court, if you ever find me, but you won't.

          • The judge will look to teh facts of the case. Either Wee can prove his comments or not. THat's the test.

          • You haven't read it.
            And why were your fake reviews posted when you hadn't?

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You made your own review pretending it wasn't you.

            That is fraudulent.

          • Did I?

            Can you show any reviews of mine aren't things I watched or read and gave an accurate synopsis of?

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You WROTE IT!!!

            And then gave a review of it.

            That is fraudulent.

          • I read and watched every book and movie I posted a review for.

            If you can read any of them and show me where the reviews are wrong, then come back and complain, until then?

            You're just a troll.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You wrote the book and then wrote a review of it. That is fraudulent.

          • I purchased the book and then read it before I posted a review on it. It applies to every singe one of the book reviews.

            Of course if you can show that review is wrong, just let me know.

          • 41 more trash comments to go

          • Just changing the number and cut and pasting the rest, it must make it almost easy enough to do off your fischer price laptop!

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            You didn't need to buy a copy, you wrote it. And then reviewed it. That is fraudulent.

          • I did buy a copy, I did read it and I did review the story as I have for all the reviews I post.

            And if you want to show why my review is wrong, just show me where.

            Oh you haven't read it. So, you're blowing methane.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            But you didn't need to buy a copy, because you wrote the book. And then you wrote your own review. That is fraudulent.

          • The review you say is mine, check it, it's a confirmed purchaser.

            And I read the book and I reviewed it like I did every other review of books on Amazon.

            Of course if the review is wrong explain why and I'll consider it.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            An author writing his own review and trying to pass it off as an outside buyer, is fraudulent.

          • Are you still pretending that I can't buy and read and review a book?

            If you can show that review is misleading or wrong, just let me know where and I'll consider it.

          • Alinsky Hero USA

            Reviewing your OWN book and passing it off as an outside buyer is fraudulent.

            It 's like reviewing that vagina on your face and calling it handsome.

          • Buying a book, reading it and then giving your opinion of it is what I do to every book, if you can explain why my review isn't accurate, go for it.

          • There is a phrase "self praise is no praise" why would you buy a copy of your own book? Very sad thing!

          • I had a reason, but not something I'd bother to explain to a guy with motivated reasoning.

          • Maybe by buying the book he doubled his sales.

          • Did you see him trying to justify submitting a review of his own book by saying this:

            "I purchased the book and then read it before I posted a review on it. It applies to every singe one of the book reviews."?

            And no, I don't know what he meant by "singe"…maybe he's a thumper book-burner.

          • He does have his own writing style, that's for sure.

          • And you both have your trolling.

            But why should I forget to mention your style?
            10 hours ago @ Speak Out America – Speak Out America · 2 replies · +2 points
            Good Lordk, yu can't eve spell "are" rigtht.

          • Why don't you tell me what part of any review is inaccurate?

            You only have your hate and trolling.

            If I won a gold metal in the olympics you'd say I did it wrong.

            So, you don't exactly have any credibility.

          • "a gold metal"? Don't you mean gold "medal"?

          • Don't you mean you have no new ideas, nothing to add and y ou have a quota you can't give up on?

          • Totally different levels?

            You insane people always rationalize all sorts of crazy shlt, don't you?

          • You insane trolls like to pretend so.

          • Yo!
            Shlt-muffin,did they rescue your boat?

          • Yo, did the stupid folks going to see the melted ice get caught and trapped in it again?

          • If so, you would have led that parade.

          • Would I? It was a global warming crowd, I'm not foolish enough to believe that man can change our temps, and that even if the temps change that it's a natural variation.

            So, you're still wrong, and you're still a troll.

  4. I remember that you are a vile, hypocritical, Un-christian misogynist.

    How is that for starters this morning?

    Reply CoCo:

  5. ROGER is looking for his ship again

  6. Can anybody help ROGER to find his ship?

  7. We all know Roger's ship sailed long ago. We all also know he was in the throes of another melt-down, couldn't think straight (duh) and was having such a hissy fit he was on Concourse B at the airport instead of at the dock. Poor victim (of his own actions).

    • We all know you get cramped on that broom and may need a ship to land on if you fly over any large body of water.

      • Wow — the melt-down seems to be in full-effect. Valium time, bucko.

        • Wow, the ill mannered shrew lashes out again!

          You go ahead and take your valium.

        • Poofsie, of course he is in the throes of a meltdown.

          You don't know his history like I do. You and Trust are late to the party. This nonsense has been going on for five years. Every month, he peaks on the night of the full moon. You should see him during the solstices and the equinoxes, when the earths gravitational pull is most extreme. he goes bonkers. His Lunar Cycles give full credence to the true meaning of the term Lun-a-tic…….

          • Good afternoon, Iremember. Nice to 'see' you!

            You're just an encyclopedia of RogerKnowledge — some time I'd love to pick your brain.

          • Yeah.
            I'm a regular Encyclopedic Roger Britanica. What he knows, and what is relevant, is a one page, double spaced, one sentence, one paragraph volume. The rest is footnotes of his gibberish and gobbelty-gook. (No, that isn't Chinese).

            Nice to see you too!
            I like you.

            Going back to when we first met, I thought you to be a worthy debate oponnent, but we have still never gotten to where we could debate anything, because this mealy-mouthed shlt-muffin interjects himself into every conversation, like a bad rash. Or more appropriately, the proverbial turd-in-the-punchbowl.

            See I tried to start a conversation with Wee at the Palestinian thread? He ruined it.

          • Ahh, shucks. Well, you're pretty likable yourself. =)

            About debating with each other, well ain't it the truth? I have a feeling we'd agree on….almost nothing, but then opposites often tend to get along famously, so hopefully sometime we'll get to have an honest debate, fight it out, kiss and make up. Haha!

            I saw his pathetic splash-down into the middle of your efforts with Wee…there really aren't words to describe his constant, droning attempts to be relevant. I'd like just once to ask him a simple question and get a simple answer. Isn't deflection the #1 red flag for trolling? He's mastered it….thrives on it….lives for it. How many years did you say he's been up to the same game-playing tactics?

          • Yeah.
            He splashed down, without a parachute.

            Face first…..

          • Like you trolls do?

            Good luck, but I think you're better off under the bridge.

          • Roger, honey,

            There is no bridge.
            There are no Trolls.
            There is no vast conspiracy.

            Not against you, or this site, or any other site.
            People simply do not like you. You have no social skills or grace. You are the perpetual spoiled brat, who comes uninvited to the party, then wonders why everyone gets mad, because you pick your nose, and fart in public.

            You are the only Troll I have ever seen on the Internet. You met all ten of the classic criteria for troll.

            Reply, Monkey:

          • You don't remember,

            SB not only admitted to it, but said he was the one in charge of thumbing me down.

            I didn't know you all were so job oriented. Too bad you can't put that energy into the private market for adding value to the economy.

          • Yeah, right.
            It is a Global Conspiracy.

            Everyone is out to get you.

            Reply, CoCo:

          • Nope, just the trolls. The posse in particular seem rather determined.

            So, you still come to spam the site in spite of having nothing to actually contribute?

          • Roger, how about a nautical update? Have they found your ship?

            Reply, Monkey:

          • Why don' t you post under patriot or your other guest profiles today?

          • Why?
            Are collecting additional "John Does" for your "lawsuit"?

          • Why not, are you pretending to be a guest troll with credibility?

          • Still looking for your ship?

    • Just checking in, to review that status on Rogers lost ship.

  8. Did that ship carrying all those global warming activists ever get rescued from summer ice?

  9. Yes I'm sure what you're saying is true, I honestly need this information for thesis research I was doing for my study program. About kontrversial herbs like crystal x<a> in asia being debated but it is not necessary to be a scientific explanation.

  10. Yes I'm sure what you're saying is true, I honestly need this information for thesis research I was doing for my study program. About kontrversial herbs like crystal x in asia being debated but it is not necessary to be a scientific explanation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *