The Inevitable Demise Of The Mainstream Media

Michael Thomas
by
April 27th, 2014
Updated 04/28/2014 at 3:25 pm

When every major Mainstream Media outlet is controlled by the CIA, the entire industry is ultimately doomed.

The days when Meet The Press was considered to be an objective political talk panel are long gone. Even back then when families were tuned in to this contrived Sunday morning program, its true agenda was transparent.  Both sides (every side) of the panel were chosen because they spouted a narrative that was within the realm of political correctness.  Because they could be relied up to stay within certain boundaries, they could  be controlled by those actually controlling the debate like the David Gregorys[1] of the world.

timthumb-2.php

Whatever shows up in the public disourse as it plays out in the MSM is always subject to the most intense forms of censorship … behind the scenes.  Nothing gets projected on the TV (or motion pictures) unless it has gone through many levels of  excruciating scrutiny.  That’s the way it’s always been; that’s the way it will always be, especially as long as the CIA is running the show.

C I A = Central Intelligence Agency = MSM Information Chokepoint

The best and easiest way to monitor and massage and manage all information that is presented to the public via a TV signal is to completely control the gatekeepers who anchor, announce, host and present the news, opinion, etc.  For example, it is common knowledge that the Meet The Press (MTP) moderator is on a very short leash; so too are all the invited guests on their respective leashes.  Whereas virtually everyone knows that David Gregory[2] has never practiced anything close to real journalism, very few know about the CIA masters to whom he really reports.  For that matter, David Gregory may not even know who his CIA handlers are.  Typically, there are several layers of buffer and management between the front line anchors throughout the US media and their CIA overlords who really run the ‘show’ and determine the programming.

Once the CIA determined that David Gregory was no longer useful to them because his credibility has been consistently lower than “dinosaur doodoo in the Mariana Trench“, “The Company” planted stories throughout the MSM that he has been subjected to psychological testing[3].  This is a classic CIA technique that is used to initiate the removal of an asset which has turned into a liability.   In the case of David Gregory, we’re talking about a HUGE liability, since Meet The Press is now not even taken seriously by the most gullible and naive among the viewing public.  Hence, psychological/psychiatric smearing is used since it has always been the quickest way to bring anyone down … fast.

The Mainstream Media is full of CIA cutouts who do the CIA’s bidding both wittingly and unwittingly.

It’s a well known fact in the upper echelons of the corporate media that every major player on all the major news networks is connected directly or indirectly to the CIA.  One simply cannot hold a position of MSM influence and power unless they have been thoroughly vetted by the folks at Langley (CIA Headquarters).  The same goes for all the editors and award-winning writers for all the major newsprint and magazines of any import.  After all, the MSM is the primary instrument by which the flow of both true and false information is modulated throughout the entire society.

A perfect example of this standard operating principle of the MSM is the way both the New York Times and Washington Post are used to originate propaganda against Russia in the current conflict in Ukraine. As the newspapers of record for so many articles that are disseminated throughout the USA, both the NYT and WashPo platforms are regularly utilized to influence public opinion to start wars and create conflict. The truth be told, the NYT has probably started more wars than any other news publication in recorded history.  It is what they do best, and what they were created to do.

Even though there do appear to be dustups between the US Federal Government and the primary propaganda organs of the MSM from time to time, these are actually contrived.  In so doing, they intend to present the appearance of not being connected at the hip.  That’s not to say that there are not genuine differences or animosities between them from time to time.  These are engineered from the top without the knowledge of the journalists who are usually put on notice (usually by way of contempt of court) by the US Federal Government.

That David Gregory never even tried to fake it reflects the true state of affairs throughout the Mainstream Media.

Most of the time there is some serious acting going on in the MSM in order to present the semblance of an objective and truly investigative media.  The Fourth Estate, after all, is looked to as the pillar of truth that holds the other three accountable for both good and ill.  In the case of Gregory, this MO was completely ignored, perhaps in the interest of seeing just how much fake journalism they could get away with.  The American people have been dumbed down for many years now, and it is quite easy to mesmerize them with just about any character who is propped up on the TV screen.

ok-d

So unconvincing has David Gregory been over the years that he has been scorned by both sides of the political aisle.  Neither right nor left wants to be associated with journalistic efforts that are insults to American intelligence, integrity and sensibilities.  He somehow has managed to offend people of every stripe and persuasion, just by being himself — a CIA construct with no substance whatsoever.  How can a CIA cutout possibly portray the truth when the single purpose of The Company is to present propaganda with a specific purpose.

When such a high profile TV journalist projects the persona of pure propaganda 24/7, the viewers starts to tune out.  Which is precisely why the MTP ratings have steadily eroded over the years.  Certainly NBC must do more than hire a brand consultant to reverse the precipitous downward trend.  The problem goes so much deeper than the handlers at the CIA are willing to admit.  That is a good thing, since their avoidance of the real issues involved will only serve to move more of their traditional audience away from the MSM and over to the alternative news realm.

Conclusion: The Journalistic Demise of David Gregory Augurs the End of the MSM

We have David Gregory to thank for the transformation of the new reporting marketplace.  The many others like him such as Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, George Stephanopoulos, Christiane Annapour, Dom Lemon, Piers Morgan, Fareed Zakaria, Matt Lauer, Andrea Mitchell, Diane Sawyer, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, Larry King, etc. are also quite instrumental in waking up the USA electorate.  All of them have contributed to the degeneration of the daily news cycle in ways that will certainly push millions of more people to the internet in search of real news.

Although this process of MSM collapse of confidence has only recently begun, it has picked up steam quite quickly.  With the ever-increasing market share experienced by the alternative news realm, it is only a matter of time before the MSM evening news broadcast and Sunday edition of the New York Times lose their influence over the nation.  The same goes for all the MSM platforms which now routinely serve up plates of propaganda with every broadcast and publication.

State of the Nation 2014
April 26, 2014
StateoftheNation2012.com

Endnotes:

[1]  ‘Meet the Press’ Pundit With Financial Ties to NSA Misleadingly Slams Snowden

[2] NBC’s Gregory Cuts Off GOP Congressman to Spew ObamaCare Propaganda

[3] Why Did NBC Hire a Shrink for ‘Meet the Press’ Host David Gregory?

References:

The CIA and The Media

1973 Church Committee Hearings, on CIA misdeeds, control of media, and the 1984 Iran/Contra Hearings

Recommended Reading:

Whoever Controls The Media Controls The World

Who REALLY Controls The Mainstream Media?

The Weather Channel Comedy Hour: Sponsored By US Department of Weather Propaganda

Share Button

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: Global, Mainstream media, Russia, TV, Ukraine, Uncategorized, US, War

Michael Thomas

About the Author ()

Michael Thomas is a contributing writer to Storyleak and Editor of the State of the Nation website, where he offers analysis on geopolitical events.

Comments (526)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Robert Harrington says:

    WOW ! This really nails it.

    The MSM can't die soon enough.

  2. Sara says:

    "Once the CIA determined that David Gregory was no longer useful to them because his credibility has been consistently lower than “dinosaur doodoo in the Mariana Trench“, “The Company” planted stories throughout the MSM that he has been subjected to psychological testing[3]. This is a classic CIA technique that is used to initiate the removal of an asset which has turned into a liability."

    Love it!

    • Guest says:

      David Gregory knew that the party was over, when they moved Meet the Press from its normal and customary Sunday morning 9 am time slot, to 10 am.

  3. Bob N. says:

    Much appreciate this extremely insightful and penetrating analysis.

    Perhaps the author has been on the inside before?

  4. Manfred Mann says:

    Did you mean MSM or LSM –> Lamestream Media???

  5. Felicia says:

    Here's the number one MSM/CIA propaganda agent:

    Obama Becomes The Poster Boy For Superpower Hypocrisy
    http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=4646

    "‘Talking Head’ Barack Obama becomes a Weapon of Mass Deception"

  6. Mr.Lincoln says:

    Yep, the myth of a 'Free Press' is officially 'BUSTED'!

    These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America ASHLEY LUTZ JUN. 14, 2012
    http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporatio

  7. Mr.Lincoln says:

    This at the root of government and government bureaucrats gone wildly insane!

    Yes, America is Still in an Official State of Emergency Global Research, February 11, 2010

    A reader asked whether the U.S. is still in an official state of emergency, and if so, what that means.

    The answer is yes, we are still in a state of emergency.

    Specifically: On September 11, 2001, the government declared a state of emergency. That declared state of emergency was formally put in writing on 9/14/2001: “A national emergency exists by reason of the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center, New York, New York, and the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, I hereby declare that the national emergency has existed since September 11, 2001 . . . .” That declared state of emergency has continued in full force and effect from 9/11 [throughout the Bush administration] to the present.

    On September 10 2009, President Obama continued the state of emergency: The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2009, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/yes-america-is-still

    • Guest says:

      Mr. Lincoln, good info.

      If anyone disputes it, just look no further than your local bank and their KYC Policies. That stands for "Know Your Customer". They have "Customer Relations Officers" whose sole role and responsibility is to report on customers, and snitch on anything that they deem to be "suspicious" behavior.

  8. Roger says:

    Of course most of us realize this is obvious.
    But the story was necessary for a lot of reasons.

    Not everyone reads financial papers and realizes how bad off the MSM is doing financially, particularly the newspapers. Newsweek, I remember when it was sold for $1, and now it's not worth that much.
    The NYTimes doesn't even own it's own building any more.

    When any industry is so out of touch with it's consumers for any reason they are doomed. In this case they thought the agenda would be worth it. They can't die fast enough.

    • LaLaLa says:

      Roger, some of us were talking about filing a formal petition with this website, regarding having you banished.

      • Roger says:

        Alinsky, what happened to that other petition you started?

          • Guest says:

            petitions

            sign in or join

            Close Roger Russell's Intense Debate account

            We, the cyber citizens using Intense Debate.com, petition the owners of Intense Debate to close Roger Russell's account.

            Roger Russell uses the Intense Debate name "Roger." He uses his own face as an avatar, including a Muslim styled mustache.

            For the last three years Roger Russell has stalked other Intense Debate commenters, particularly the commenter known as "WeeToddEdwards."

            He follows "WeeToddEdwards from site to site making sexual advances, destroying each website he visits in the process, and destroying all real debate.

            Roger Russell has over one hundred and thirty eight thousands comments, and has never once mentioned having a girlfriend.

            He has recently filed a frivolous lawsuit in a vain attempt to get personal information from the man he has been cyber stalking.

            We demand that Intense Debate close Roger Russell’s account immediately.

          • Guest says:

            Bravo!

          • Roger says:

            Wow, it must have hit a nerve, there you are playing so many parts in this charade of a dialogue.

          • MissysBig8 says:

            Hilarious! Mention a Tranny and Roger shows up.

            Breathless…………

          • Roger says:

            Not really, where in the comment I replied to is there anything but empty insults? Why do you always have to lower this to a spammed thread about sex?

            Alinsky, why does this site so upset the troll posse that you still have keep targeting the site?

          • Guest says:

            How goes the posting at The Growl?
            How about DrNerdLoves, or LRC, or Heritage, of FPM, or Von Misses? Not doing so well, huh bub?

          • Roger says:

            Why don't you pop in over there and ask Zebrano when I last posted the off topic kinds of comments you spam the place with here?

          • Guest says:

            You certainly have quite the distinction Roger. You are the only person I ever heard of, who was so vile, that they got banned from a sexually explicit website.

            Bet your lawyer loved that.

          • Roger says:

            You certainly have a distinction.

            Only you would be here spamming about a sexually explicit site.
            Which guest troll are you, it's hard to keep you all straight there are so many here spamming the site.

            Why does it offend the posse so much?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            We can get more signatures. This needs to posted at all sites where he trolls

          • Guest says:

            Excellent idea.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Thank you

          • Roger says:

            You sure do, for a tolerant atheist, go on the attack a lot.

          • Guest says:

            What is the matter with you Roger?
            Feeling a little growly?
            Not enough fiber in your diet?

          • Roger says:

            For starters there is this really 'aunt flow' kind of troll that keeps spamming sites that I enjoy.

            What is the matter with you, running short on pads?

          • Guest says:

            Well Helen, that is downright rude of you……..

          • Roger says:

            Still have swollen ankles?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            It's not an attack, just tired of trolling along with everyone else and somethings needs done about it. YOU for sure need banned from this site like the other 6 sites you are banned from for trolling

          • Roger says:

            It is what it is. Why backpedal now?

            And once more the posse is determined to destroy this site, you've driven off everyone else that might challenge your agenda. No wonder you are all so cranky today.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Why do you pretend you can define my moods? I am in a good mood.
            You driven people off but for the most part we have a great group of posters on this site the only problem is YOU

          • Roger says:

            You define your own moods, I simply call you on it when you pretend later to have said something else.

            And the posse is the only one left standing here other than me. The rest you have driven off with all the spamming between you and your cadre of supporters.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Yeah and I am in a good mood so why do you pretend I am not?

            They are not a posse, just a bunch of good old fashion Patriots posting on a great web site and trying to get rid of the troll know as roger so this site can survive.

          • Roger says:

            When the guest trolls are banned that will go a long way to restoring what this site was before the posse targeted it.

            When alinsky and any other cowards can't hide then they might be more respectful.

          • Guest says:

            I posted it at the von Misses website.

          • Roger says:

            So, you're branching out on your spamming?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Don't really care for that site

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            They banned me after a day. They are like scared little children as soon as you expose them for their intellectual dishonesty.

            The cult of Austrian Economics.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I agree. Pretty boring and lame topics

          • Roger says:

            Or they are just smart enough to post comment longer than two sentences, which seemed to offend alinsky.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            No, I just don't like the place or the topics

          • Roger says:

            Fine, you are entitled to your own opinions of course.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I know

          • Roger says:

            And I am entitled to mine. But I can explain mine.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Roger attempted many times to derail the threads with insanely stupid comments, and then reported my comments to have them deleted.

            A troll.

          • Roger says:

            Explaining fiat currency to you was futile, not because my comments were derailing, but because you weren't there to learn.

            And they didn't think I was the troll.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            They told you to learn economics, and left the rest of your idiocy alone.

            You made a fool of yourself trying to explain money, it amazing me just how stupid you really are.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Yeah I saw him get schooled

          • Roger says:

            You saw alinsky have his clock cleaned. But of course the posse circles around their own.

          • Roger says:

            Really? Says the guy who thinks that just saying bit coin has value doesn't make it 'fiat' currency?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            It's decentralized currency, stupid.
            Therefore not a fiat.

            The guy that told you to learn economics on Mises site, posted a great link showing that Austrian Economics is embracing the bit coin, as they come to learn more about it.

            The stupid POP Austrian Economics dummies I was arguing with have absolutely no idea how bit coins work.

            But that will change,
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSMVh8fzWpU

          • Roger says:

            Being centralized or not isn't what determines if a currency is a fiat currency.

            Your had all this explained to you in detail yesterday.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Yes it does. A fiat money is based on a countiry's economy as interpreted by banks and the market.

            Bit Coin is not based on anything but a computer code chain process. Therefore it is not based on an any economy, and therefore is not a fiat.

            It is decentralized.

            BTW Krugman does not like Bit Coin, or still is not convinced, but Libertarian Capitalists are discovering that it is what Hayek was writing about all along. .

            It is explained by Zeffery Tucker in the video.

          • Roger says:

            No, "Fiat" is an old word that doesn't mean what you pretend it does.

            Someone 'said' (fiat is spoken or decree) bit coin was money, and it was accepted as fact, so it's a fiat currency.

            Non fiat currency has value in it, besides what people say. Gold coins are worth the gold even if people say it's not real money.

            That's the difference. It was explained to you yesterday by more than one person.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You are incredibly stupid. You lack any understanding about this subject,

            Why does gold have value? Because someone "said" it does, based on its usefulness, beauty, and scarcity. And others agreed. And so it replaced the barter system.

            Later paper money "notes" based on the value of that gold were created by governments

            Later we went off the gold standard and based the value of money on the weath of a countiy's economy.

            That money is called fiat money.

            It is based on a county's economy.

            Bit Coins are not based on a county's economy. Their value is based on the peer to peer, no middle man exchange of the computer chain code.

          • Trustfunded says:

            This has been amazing to watch. What makes money "fiat money" is having the backing of a government. Our government doesn't even consider Bit Coins to be currency but rather, the IRS considers it "property". Give it a rest Roger, you aren't winning this debate.

          • Roger says:

            So, you came to help another member of the posse.

            He's not worth the effort, really.

            You may want to define "Fiat" and go from there. It's more than a car.

          • Roger says:

            You call me stupid and say gold only has value because someone says so?

            How about this.
            Gold doesn't corrode.
            It's non toxic to humans
            It's conductive to electrical charge
            It's soft enough to easily shape in circuitry.

            It has value completely outside it's use in coins.

            Bit coin? Not so much, it's a 'fiat' currency based on what people say.

            In one EMP pulse it's all gone.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Yes, I said that gold has usefulness.

            Jesus, you are just really stupid.

          • Roger says:

            I'm not the one that said gold is a fiat currency.

            So……

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I didn't either so….you are fu c k i ng stupid.

          • Roger says:

            You said this:

            'Why does gold have value? Because someone "said" it does, based on its usefulness, beauty, and scarcity. And others agreed. And so it replaced the barter system."

            By definition any currency only worth value due to what is said about it is a 'fiat currency' and you just said that about gold yesterday, I just quoted you.

            I don't name call, but you made it really tempting.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            The gold standard and money based on a county's economy are two diffrent thing…YOU F U C K IN G RETARD!!!!

            I said money USED to be on a gold standard, NOT ANYMORE<

            YOU ARE so F u C K I NG ST UPID!!!!

          • Roger says:

            Is it? I don't think so.

            The value of gold isn't the same as 'the gold standard', if you were half as smart as you want to pretend you would know that.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Yoiu arew a f u ck ing fraud, just making up s h i t. Iyt is clear you are retarded.

            Sarah Ashley, you made the right choice with this stuoid a ss .

          • Roger says:

            Still relying on insults since you can't figure out anything when you post on complicated topics?

          • Takes Direction Well says:

            Uh…. okay

            You're stupid. Gold only has value because someone says so.

          • Roger says:

            Of course not, and I just listed a few reasons why.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Gold has usefulness, but the value of that usefulness is perceived

            Economics 101, you stupid b it ch.

          • Roger says:

            More name calling?

            Gold is worth what ever people will pay for it, that is determined by what they use it for and how badly it's needed.

            And that determines it's value, economics 101, you just didn't want to admit what economics actually is.

          • silvia says:

            take a hike little boy

          • Roger says:

            I don't go into the woods with strangers, trolls or bossy people sucking pamprin.

          • Moleman says:

            Here's the thing: In an economy where a precious metal is used as a unit of exchange, it's not so much what that metal is "worth", but the fact that it can not be artificially manipulated- i.e. you can't "inflate" gold, because you can't just print it up out of thin air, like they do with dollars. (Of course, in an economy that is based on fiat paper currency….the currency can effect the perceived value of the metal, because the phony currency is the ultimate unit of exchnage by which all things are measured).

          • Roger says:

            Why do you think he's correct?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            "yet to be discredited as a viable alternative to fiat currency.”

            Do you know what alternative means? You stupid b i tch.

            You are a pathological liar trying to cover up the fact you are a half retard going on full retard.

          • Roger says:

            So much name calling.
            So much foul language.

            It's all you have.

          • silvia says:

            just go away

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You are so f u ck ing dumb. No wonder you can't admit bitcoins aren't a fiat.

            Sarah Ashley must be so happy right now.

          • Roger says:

            It's worth what people say it's worth, a fiat currency.

            Even if you won't admit it.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            What the F uch are you saying???

            You can't just put radium words together when you are exposed for being so f u cj k ing stupid.

          • Roger says:

            The comment is clear enough, try reading it again.

          • fixitagaintony says:

            I didn't say I did. A fiat currency, by definition, is declared legal tender by the government. From investopedia:

            Definition of 'Fiat Money'

            Currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material that the money is made of. Historically, most currencies were based on physical commodities such as gold or silver, but fiat money is based solely on faith. Fiat is the Latin word for "it shall be".

            You will not find any credible definition of fiat money that does not require government decree.

          • Roger says:

            Fiat= by decree
            "Currency that government has declared…" – by decree.

            Bit coin- having worth because they decree it does.

            A fiat currency – when it rises to the true level of 'money'.

          • Guest says:

            Holy shlt Roger. You truly are just about the dumbest person I've ever seen try to type a word.

          • Roger says:

            I don't know, on my worst day I can't reach your level.

          • Stan says:

            I believe that.

          • Roger says:

            He aims low then practices until he gets it right.

          • salsa says:

            stalker, when is the last time you stalked zeb? Afraid of the old frenchman? Looks like you need another french spanking

          • Roger says:

            Looks like you need a good time out.

            Why don't you go sit in a dark room and try to remember that cut and paste routine.

            Some day when they get done laughing at you they may let you back on the computer.

          • Guest says:

            "And they didn't think I was the troll."

            Yes. They most certainly did think you were a troll. Especially after I posted that petition. I've posted it everywhere but ConsVic.

          • Roger says:

            How nice, and how is that working for you?

            Guest posts don't get a lot of credibility.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I saw that

          • Roger says:

            Yes, you probably had something to do with it, in my opinion.

          • Roger says:

            They like 'thinking' people.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well you won't be there long then huh?

          • Roger says:

            I am doing just fine there.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well maybe you should just stay there because you are not doing fine here

          • Roger says:

            I'm holding my own pretty well. How many trolls do you have spamming the place today?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            No you are doing pretty bad. I don't have any trolls. YOu are the trol

          • Roger says:

            That's so nice that you can say that.
            Of course anyone with sense will see through it.

            Is it time for guest to chime in to support you again?

          • Guest says:

            No. They banned him already.

          • Roger says:

            You really aren't very factual, who's manning the 'guest' today?

        • DefendantDoe says:

          It got as much traction as your lawsuit.

      • TheNewsMadd says:

        We should send the admins the petition

        • Guest says:

          Yes.
          We definitely should.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well something has to be done. He is wrecking this site and needs to go.

          • Roger says:

            For the last two stories I posted a great comment and the debate was going fine until the posse attacked the site/story again.

            Something has to be done, and a great first step would be to ban guest comments. Of course that would limit your cadre of supporters immensely.

          • Guest says:

            Bullshlt.
            For the last two stories, I posted the first comment at the top of the thread. Conversation was fine, until you showed up. You need banned. Banned from here, banned from everywhere. Banned from using the Internet. You are so bad, that Sex sites ban you for being vile.

            How does your attorney like that?

            Roger Russell was banned from a sex site……………

          • Roger says:

            Still the troll spamming the site?
            I didn't just claim to be the first, just that I did it before the posse attacked the site.

            And frankly you're such a sad example, let me explain this slowly. Just because a guest did post a comment doesn't mean it was you.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Really where? Your comments are not so great and you go after anyone posting as a guest and wreck the threads

          • Roger says:

            Really where? Follow this thread up to the first comment in it.

            WTE, are you up to this?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Not a great comment IMO and not worthy of this site.

            What does everyone else think?

          • Roger says:

            Sure it is. It's not topic, is factual and the your insults without explaining why it's wrong or what you do think about the topic is typical of you insult and attack mentality.

            What does everyone think? That's why debate matters. What they think can be explained in comments to be tossed back and forth, until your cadre of characters derails and dimities the site to the point where that can't happen.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            No it's not. It was a smart a$$ comment designed to insult people
            "Of course most of us realize this is obvious." Insulting

            "Not everyone reads financial papers and realizes how bad off the MSM is doing financially, particularly the newspapers" Insulting, pretty much calling people uniformed and stupid

          • Roger says:

            You are entitled to your opinion of course.

            But you are stretching. And wrong in my view. I started with a statement and explained it.

            Had I wanted to be insulting, for example I would have worded it differently. Something perhaps more like this… "This is obvious to all but the dense and the unwilling to face facts…"

            But I didn't. You just can't stand that anyone stands up to your flawed positions and then is able to post thinking comments before you pounced on this story the next day.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            It was insulting.

            YOU have not shown my postions are flawed so you can quit with that lie

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            No you didn't

          • Roger says:

            Yes, I did.
            Read the comment then try responding to it.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I did and you did not show I was flawed.

          • Roger says:

            You did what? You made a position in a comment and I explained why I don't agree with it.

            Is this a contest to see how quickly you can confuse?

            WTE, I know what I said and what I meant, anything you say contrary is just opinion.

          • Guest says:

            Here Wee,
            from Drudge http://miami.cbslocal.com/2014/04/28/man-arrested

            Another out of control storm trooper.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Yuck, these cops need taught a lesson.

            Thank you for posting the link

          • Roger says:

            We need to be vigilante, I won't give up my freedoms willingly.

          • Guest says:

            Yeah.
            Vigilant. You are the original Urban Vigilante.

            PS:
            Mr. Author, you used the word Vigilante, where the word vigilant would have sufficed.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I though you were against vigilantes?

            Now you support them

          • Guest says:

            He is not sure whether he is for, or against vigilante's. Just as soon as he learns how to use the word in its proper context, he'll get back to you on it………..

          • Roger says:

            Just because you can't say anything yourself you act so brave wandering around confused insulting everyone else.

            It's all you have, isn't it?

          • Guest says:

            Speaking of being brave, I am surprised at you Roger. I thought that you, and HPduuuuh and the old Dooshe would certainly have loaded up the VW microbus, and headed to the Bundy Farm. Especially with Dooche being an OathKeeper and such.

            All these years talking tough, just went down the gutter………..

          • Roger says:

            Why? He has plenty of people there.

          • Roger says:

            This is consistent with my past comments.

            We need to watch, and act on it. Having bad officers fired, replacing the department head and training departments and recalling any council members that try to get in the way.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            You have said in the past you are against vigilante justice. So you are changing your stance now?

            Or did you use the word wrong?

          • Guest says:

            Hell.
            He doesn't know. He doesn't even know what day it is, let alone how to spell it.

          • Roger says:

            Or I simply find ways to say what I mean that you want to pick at.

          • Roger says:

            Being vigilant with the will to act on what you see is not the same as 'vigilante justice' which historically means violence outside of the justice system.

            Firing bad cops is common sense and requires watching, with acting and applying political pressure afterwards.

            Did you just have a moment without possible thought?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            You just said we need to be vigilantes.

            vig·i·lan·te
            noun \ˌvi-jə-ˈlan-tē\

            : a person who is not a police officer but who tries to catch and punish criminals

          • Roger says:

            Nope, and you should really quote me if you are pretending to quote me.
            I said "We need to be vigilante"

            And if a police officer abuses his office he is a criminal and we need to make sure he faces justice.

            That is not the same as vigilante justice that administers justice themselves.

            Can't you do better that this? I doubt, it but really you should try.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Did you mean vigilant or vigilante?

            vig·i·lant
            adjective ˈvi-jə-lənt

            : carefully noticing problems or signs of danger

            Just trying to figure out what you are saying. IF you mean we need to be vigilante then you mean:
            : a person who is not a police officer but who tries to catch and punish criminals

          • Roger says:

            I meant exactly what I said, and I've explained it since.

            If you can't keep up, this may not be the forum for you.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            So we need to be vigilantes.

            Glad you changed your stance.

            You should have put an (s) on the end of "vigilante" for proper wording

            "We need to be vigilante" really does not make sense. unless you meant vigilant

          • Roger says:

            No, and repeating a lie is what some might consider harassment.

            I said exactly what I said and if you want to quote me, then you should 'quote' me. You don't get to make up quotes and pretend I said something.

            I used exactly the word I intended to use and have explained why.

            If this is all too much for you, perhaps you should find a less challenging forum.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            We all need to be vigilante means excatally what you said, we all need to be vigalantes:

            vig·i·lan·te
            noun \ˌvi-jə-ˈlan-tē\

            : a person who is not a police officer but who tries to catch and punish criminals

            That is the defintiion

          • Roger says:

            You can say what you mean.

            I said what I meant.

            Wee, you're floundering.

          • Guest says:

            Wee, that is a scary thought.

            Roger Russell.

            Manhunter………….

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Pretty sure he already is a manhunter

          • Roger says:

            Pretty sure you both are spamming the site and are struggling to twist something I explained.

          • Guest says:

            Look Roger. We found someplace where you can post your pearls of wisdom. Somewhere your Christian values will be appreciated http://instagram.com/p/nOx0xDK-rC/

          • Roger says:

            How nice for you.

            Why don't you do research and just stay there for a few months and make sure?

          • Roger says:

            Yes, and you are free to use it.

            One is watching, on is watching and acting on it.

          • Guest says:

            "on is watching and acting on it.

            Huh?
            Man you are dumb.

          • Roger says:

            Not as dumb as you.

            Why are you pretending to be here for anything?
            Oh, the posse agenda. I almost forgot (not).

          • Roger says:

            And the courts will exonerate him.
            The local police department needs to be cleaned out.

          • Guest says:

            This website needs cleaned out. You need to go.

          • Roger says:

            Still another guest troll tries to pretend he not only knows what's best for the site but is being honest about it too.

            The posse is sure full of angst this morning.

          • Guest says:

            How did you spell angst? You must have a new Webster's.

          • Roger says:

            Still doing the 'crawl by' trolling?

            No wonder you don't use a profile, I'd want to remain anonymous if I was as bad at this as you are.

  9. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    This article is silly. The problem is the FCC which just imposed new rules that will help corporations control everything we can see on the internet.

    The MSM isn't going anywhere.

    • Roger says:

      That wasn't the point of the story, or it's focus.
      If the CIA wants the FCC to put out more rules, that won't fix the problem, the media has no credibility. It has been too obvious just like Gregory was.

      • Alinsky Hero USA says:

        That's why I say it's silly. Wrong point, wrong focus. Also, you don't understand the point I made about the FCC's net neutrality rules.

        • guest says:

          Roger lives in lalalalalalalala land

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He;s looking up what net neutrality means, so that he can come back acting like he is an expert in the subject.

          • guest says:

            What are you an expert in? 24/7 on ID just spamming and stalking?
            Show me some results on how you are transforming this Country.

          • guest says:

            Sorry, that was meant for Roger.

          • ForwardObserver says:

            Come on man. Don't start again. This is a fresh thread. Don't ruin it, like you have ruined the last one hundred threads. There were so many idiotic comments on the last thread, that it was not worth reading.

        • SUA says:

          The FCC's recent rulings on net neutrality open the door to a corporatized Internet … just a little bit. The deal between Comcast and Netflix is not a red herring, as all ISPs have to manage substantial load that Netflix puts on the network – as high as 30% of all domestic traffic over the last few years. That said, this is the time for individuals to chime in with the FCC on net neutrality – the argument that will carry perhaps more weight than freedom of speech is that allowing ISPs to play favorites will stifle innovation and harm small and start up e-business. One of the co-founders of Reddit, for example, has made the point that they could not have succeeded if they had to pay to play.

          …and no, I did not have to Google the issue. This is one is relevant to my interests.

    • Mr. Liberty says:

      Agreed Alinsky, sad but true.

      But I do agree with the article on the notion that the CIA controls MSM.

      Check this video from the Church Committee Hearing:
      http://topinfopost.com/2014/02/20/the-cia-admits-

      • Alinsky Hero USA says:

        I believe they have manipulating it for years, but have control, that's a stretch.

        Ever see the movie The Falcon and the Snowman?

        I'm sure you have. It's about that very thing.

        • Roger says:

          Even if you discount any central control over the media, and too much evidence exists to show there is collusion at least….
          http://teamcoco.com/video/conan-highlight-media-r

          That still leaves the valid conclusion on this story. The MSM no longer has any credibility and is dead or dying.

        • MissysBig8 says:

          Not to change the topic at hand, but Alinsky, what do you think about the news du jour concerning Donald Sterling? I find it interesting and amusing that the MSM will not touch that Sterling is a Jewish Democrat.

          I think it is deplorable what that gold digging c*unt did to the old man. She not only cuckholded him, but then she rubbed his nose in it. He bought her Ferraris, and Bentley's and 1.4 million in real estate. She really must have swallowed.

          Look at her. She looks like a tranny with a bad plastic surgeon.

          • Roger says:

            Of course you wanted to change the subject.

            There must be sites that cater to off topic chatting.
            From the top of this page and homepage I don't think this site is one of them.

          • Guest says:

            Shut the f*ck up.
            Last week we had to wade through 100 posts here, where you were spouting your wisdom about cooking with your BGE.

          • Roger says:

            And how many of them were yours?

            Perhaps you shouldn't throw stones in a glass house. I also want to point our, your comments was exactly the trash you keep pretending all my comments are.

            Touche.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I like that Kerry has just called out Netanyahu's policies for being racist. And I supported Carter when he said the same thing.

            I would hate if this led to Serling breaking up with his girlfriend. .

            I hope he admits he is a Republican.

          • Roger says:

            I like that some people don't spam this place with off topic issues like you just did.

          • Administrator says:

            I'd like it if you went away, but I'm not holding my breath.

          • Roger says:

            And I bet the administrator would like it if you didn't impersonate him.

          • Guest says:

            Nope. Donald Sterling is a Jewish Democrat.

            Look on the bright side Alinsky. His girlfriend is Black/Latino. Nobody can accuse her of being a Mud Shark.

            Further on the bright side, Sterling is providing jobs. They don't have to all be sitting on their porches in North Las Vegas, while the childrens run scampering around. Oops. Wrong story. That was Cliven Bundy. Too much cotton, not enough Cotton Pickers….

            I feel sorry for the old geezer, getting cuckholded in public by her skank ass.

          • Jamal says:

            Mud Shark? Dat haint no mudshark! Dat some high yeller, high dollar Tupelo Honey…………

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, can't you get the same entertainment spamming another site with all these pretend chats?

          • Barroid says:

            Hush Roger. Get JeepWonder and come on over to Disqus with me. We can flamethrow them at Breitbart.

          • Roger says:

            Still spamming the site.

            Why does the posse hate this site so much?

          • HpDuuuuh says:

            I love this site. I despise you.

          • Roger says:

            You're entitled to your opinions.
            And the site is entitled to it's stories and the hope that adults will come and discuss them.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You sound familiar. Are you Mel Gibson?

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            No. Not even close.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            HiPlainsDrifter @ Conservative Victory News – Nervous New York Times… 21 minutes ago · 0 replies · +1 points
            We throw ours under the bus….the lefttards circle the busses…. or wagons as the saying goes…

          • Roger says:

            He was right.
            So, what was your point, or were you just spamming the site again?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            None of your business. Are you his boyfriend or something? I'm not interested.

          • Roger says:

            Back again? Wasn't your posse doing very well without your brand of mud being thrown?

          • PoofSheGone says:

            You'd know all about mudslinging, wouldn't you? You little turd-burgler.

          • Roger says:

            Just more spam from just one more pretend guest.
            I know about mud slinging, you've tossed enough at me I should have an honorary degree.

          • PoofSheGone says:

            Of course he is.
            The have a regular Bromance going on.

            Have Man-dates regularly at ConsVic.

            I see HPDuuuh hasn't left there since he got busted for his Barroid avitar on Disqus. That is rank racism in its most vile form.

          • Roger says:

            Dream on.
            I'n not interested.

            You and alinsky might want to discuss that off forum.

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            Saul, you must admit, that this is hilarious.

            Donald Sterling looks just like Marge Schott http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marge_Schott

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            Nobody can say they aren't Tribesmen.

          • Peter Rose says:

            Marge Schott was good for baseball in the beginning. She just took it a little too far.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Soak it up. But it's just a matter of time before we find a white conservative non-Jew that is also racist.

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            You mean other than the Mormon Cow-billy? Everyone knew that Bundy was not credible, when Sarah Palin did not show up in front of the cameras. The only person that bought Bundys bull feces was Roger.

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            Saul, one must retain a sense of humor. The comments are hilarious. http://wonkette.com/547766/lets-talk-about-donald

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He is a registered Republican, according to the Los Angeles County voter registry.
            http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2

          • Donald Tokowitz says:

            GREAT!

            Sterling can be campaign manager for the Bundy/Palin 2016 ticket.

            Got Beef?

          • Jamal says:

            I think it is great that those rich, racist Republicans provide good paying jobs for all those basketball peoples. It keeps them from haffing to pick cotton.

          • SenileRancher says:

            They didn't learn to pick cotton in the first place. They would be happier if they had.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            It does not matter if he is a Dem or Rep. That is a racist, elitist, pig. Honestly, aside from Bundy's terrible word selection, can we really say that those two are comparable? I mean Bundy never said blacks are "lower than dogs" or insinuated that his workers were his slaves. This is the difference I was trying to illustrate the other day. Bundy wants any minority to rise up and join the Liberty movement. True he used outdated words and def should of used a better analogy than cotton picking, but IMO his heart is in the right place. He genuinely wants good fortune and happiness for all. Sterling sees them as beneath him, after all he “clothes them, feeds them, and doesn’t want them at his games”.

            Do you agree or disagree with my analysis, I am sure you don’t but do you at least understand my defense of Bundy?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Kinda like when Christians say they don't hate homosexuals, they just want them to turn straight so that God will love them.

          • Guest says:

            Liberty, Alinsky, I just intently watched Al Sharpton and his guest. Not one of them eehked or ooked anything about Sterling being a Republican. If he was, they would have been singing that song from the treetops. It does not smell right. We will all know if he is, in a day or so. If he is a Republican, MSNBC will be running this story 24/7 for a month. It will be Al Sharpton's Malaysian Jetliner Incident………

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            The conservatives are the only one that have made it an issue, when they thought the was a Democrat. and it backfired on them.

            Ha ha.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            IMO it does not matter what party he belongs too. He is an elitist racist, and they are the worst of the worst. That is why I dislike globalists they are party in name only. They do not care about any other humans but themselves.

          • Roger says:

            This story is about the MSM and how it can't be taken seriously.

            I haven't heard the issue raised here about the two party consent law in California. If any two party conversation is recorded both parties have to give consent for it.

            He didn't consent, obviously… so anyone that airs the tapes is exposing themselves to liability issues. Big time, since he is losing sponsors and other losses due to the fall out.

            The MSM is again jumping the shark where it shouldn't and it seems that there must be some other reason for this other than his personal views that nobody has claimed effected his business conduct.

            This story was very timely, even if the trolls didn't think enough for the connection.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He did ask her to record their conversations according to Fox News.

            I believe she has the right to do whatever she wants to do with the recordings.

            The press has the freedom to report the news.

          • Roger says:

            So, has he given consents for the tapes being played?

            Doesn't sound like it.

            ""How can we make this go away?," the site says Sterling asked her. Stiviano reportedly told him to contact her lawyer."

            Sounds like it could be turned into a court case calling it blackmail, and if he did request it to remind him of things he was forgetting he may claim he didn't have the capacity to consent.

            Either way, it's the media making a huge deal out of something on a day when important news is ignored.

            Israel, an apartheid state on the anniversary of the shoah? Our Secretary of state should be ashamed.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I don't believe she needs consent for the tapes to be played. They are her property.

            The NBA is in the middle of the playoffs, it's big news, and important.

            Kerry is correct. But should you bring that up on this story? Are you being hypercritical?

          • Roger says:

            You typically ignore the point.
            And don't care about the facts, even when laid out for you.
            http://www.aapsonline.org/judicial/telephone.htm

            That's why I address my comment to Mr. Liberty originally, I knew real dialogue was wasted on you.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Sterling consented to being recorded, stupid.

          • Roger says:

            He may have consented to some, but all? He allowed some due to failing memory, so having the facilities to consent is in question.

            He didn't consent to have them released. That's more important. Her demanding money to make them go away is extrusion, and that's illegal.

            And why the name calling, is it because you have nothing else?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He consented to all, stupid.

            His girlfriend doesn't need consent to realese them , stupid.

            You are really f u ck injg dull and stupid.

          • Roger says:

            He did?
            Prove that he consented to each recording, and then that he consents to their release.

            I'm waiting.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He told her to recorded all their conversations, stupid, that means each and every one of them , stupid.

          • Roger says:

            So, he didn't know when the recorder was running, and you didn't show he consented to any being released.

          • V. Stiviano says:

            "Girlfriend"?

            I think you better look again Alinsky. That is no girl. It is a chick with a dick.

          • Roger says:

            TMZ may have a place where comments like that are the norm. I sure hope the posse doesn't lower this site to that level.

          • Guest says:

            Personally, I think he is a rich, entitled Jew, doing what rich, entitled Jews do best. I do not care what political party he belongs to. They say he is the single largest private landowner in Beverly Hills. His actions are deplorable. Bundy was an uneducated Cow-billy. This guy Sterling should know better. He does know better. He just behaves obnoxiously, because he thinks his money allows him to do so.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            We all know your dumb opinion HPD. Now grow a set and post with your own name.

          • Roger says:

            We all know you pretend and impersonate everyone.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            We know you try to impersonate a heterosexual.

          • Roger says:

            We know you hope so.

            This site isn't for that kind of topic, go find one that is.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            We know you try to impersonate a heterosexual.

            You don't mind if I say that on this site do you,

            We know you try to impersonate a heterosexual.

          • Roger says:

            Still trying to lower the debate?
            Still spamming the place?

            Still pretending you can decide what issues are important?

            None of that is working for you.
            If you think I'm wrong say why. But this isn't your own personal adult web site.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Still saying "still" a hundred times a day.
            So dull.

          • Roger says:

            Still spamming a hundred times a day?

            So dull.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            At least you stole the word dull from me today.

            Now you can repeat two words a hundred times today.

          • Still Dull says:

            The word dull fits Roger like a Speedo.

            A regular Dullard.

          • Roger says:

            And guest troll fits you.

            But if I say so then I'm lowering myself to your standards by relying on name calling.

            No, it's not since you are a guest troll.
            It's labeling.

          • Roger says:

            Still spamming the site. How surprising.

          • Roger says:

            He posts under his real profile.
            Do you really think impersonating people actually works?

          • Rogre says:

            Well, I could not impersonate you. I'd never be able to lower my IQ that far, without stopping my heartbeat.

          • Roger says:

            Still more posse spam.

            Why do you all hate this site so much?

          • guest says:

            We need zeb to cleanse your clock

          • Roger says:

            We need him to clean yours.
            He doesn't like spam, the trademark of your posse.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            I don't hate homosexuals. They are people too. . I am no better than the next person. I don't condone their lifestyle however, but that is my opinion. Do I think a homosexual can go to heaven? Of course I know a lot of Christians speak differently but IMO they are missing the point of Christ.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            There is a whole lot of…. I think 'colored people" are lazy, but not because I'm racist, but because I can blame liberals for it…going on.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            Yeah, it def can be interpreted that way. You talking about Bundy right? IMO the biggest down fall of Soc policies is that very thing though. It is called the "Free Rider Problem" in economics. The Soc policies inadvertently create "laziness" because people know that no matter how hard or how less they work it does not affect their outcome. I.e. goods, services, and pay. I feel like Bundy was not saying black people are lazy people in general, he is saying that the welfare state promotes laziness, poor family structure, and crime. I know you disagree with that perception, but I don’t think it is fair to label him a racist for that opinion.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Maybe he will come out with a video saying that he thinks rich white "crackers" are lazy because of all the money they inherited, and not because they are white.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            Yeah the richies who inherent money bother me too. They are the laziest of the lazy in some cases. I have seen kids swing both ways. Some bust ass, others are asses. I am a fan of the estate tax, a soc policy :) I think there def should be a cap on how much one can inherent. This will keep money from being hoarded like the Rothchild and Rockefeller families.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            The point is, you don't hear Bundy saying white rich people are lazy.

          • GoBeefMafia says:

            Bundy is an entitled grass thief. But then again, didn't Obama tell Joe the Plumber that we all had to share the wealth? Bundy is just practicing what Obama preached.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Obama said we all have to pay our fair share.

          • Roger says:

            Obama also said we could keep our doctors.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Unless the insurance company are cheating you.

          • Roger says:

            Nope, just "If you like your doctors you can keep them" and then repeated it on tape more than 20 times.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He didn't mean you can keep your doctor in your closet. Or that the doctor wasn't allowed to ever retire.

            There are common sense exceptions to that statement.

            One of which is, that insurance companies can not break the law in order for you to keep your doctor,, stupid.

          • Roger says:

            And he did lie and we can't keep our doctors.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Don't blame him for lying because you are too stupid know the law.

          • Roger says:

            I blame him for lying because he lied.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He didn't lie, you are just too stupid to understand that you can't keep your doctor forever. Doctor retire, stupid.

          • Roger says:

            Of course he did.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You are a pathological liar Mr. Roger Raymond Russell.

          • Roger says:

            There you go again.
            Why do you think I'm really that person?

            This isn't a place for personal information and if you do post personal information you should make sure you know what you're talking about.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            That is you.

          • Roger says:

            Why don't you serve that person a counter complaint and see how it works for you.

            I dare you.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I triple dog dare you to tell the truth. That is you.

          • Roger says:

            Dare me to what exactly? Nope, don't bother answering. I don't want to know.

          • Roger says:

            Still impersonating someone else?

            It's all you know.

          • Roger says:

            He doesn't have time, he and his family are too busy working his cattle ranch.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He had time to go on Fox News a dozen times. Not once did he mention lazy rich white people.

          • Roger says:

            Sounds busy to me.
            And when you run a cattle ranch then you'd understand he has a lot of work. He shovels more BS than you do, only he has callouses on his hands from doing it.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Don't you ever get tired of your dull wit?

          • NoBeefMafia says:

            I know he wears me out.

          • Roger says:

            Yet here you are in many faces and all spewing spam.

          • Roger says:

            Nope, it's not dull. There is dull wit here and I have been tired of it for a long while, but here you are still.

            Can you take the rest of the posse with you when you leave?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You are a dull as the movie Soap Dish.

          • Roger says:

            And you're so dull you can't even get the humor of Sally Fields.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I love Sally Fields. This was her best,
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RiKfSvPNWw

          • Roger says:

            Still trolling and trying to derail the threads here?

            Why does the posse hate this site so much?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Another dull comment by Roger.

          • Roger says:

            Another spam comment on behalf of the posse.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I don't think he does.

          • Roger says:

            I don't expect it. Tolerance doesn't seem to be one of your most well used tactics.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Could you imagine his inflated head if he actually sold more than 10 books?

          • Roger says:

            Still more spam to derail the thread?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Still more "still."

          • Roger says:

            Still more spam?

          • NoBeefMafia says:

            Big cattle rancher, huh Roger?
            Land Baron?

            Bundy is a fraud.
            Everyone knows it, and had moved on. Even that idiot Sean Hannity admitted he was duped. Everyone has admitted it, except you.

          • Roger says:

            You are entitled to that opinion.

            The BLM is the fraud, where in the 10th amendment does it say they have an iron fist over an 8th of the land mass in the US?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I was surprised to see William Kristol, and Charles Krauthammer condemn him

            Only in the closet, homosexual, Matt Drudge is silent.

          • Roger says:

            Why do you think you know more about this than black leadership?
            http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/black-leader-says-bund

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Link something about a black leader.

          • Roger says:

            I did.
            Post comments that make sense.

          • Guest says:

            Alinsky, I just found a woman for Roger http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/28/donald-sterling-v-s

          • Roger says:

            Too bad you can't go discuss it with him on an adult dating site.

            This site isn't here for that kind of stuff.

          • NoBeefMafia says:

            Ranch?

            Wow! You are easily impressed by the Cow-billy image. They are Mormon Squatters. Free-grazers. Grass thieves.

            The "ranch" is 160 acres. Donald Sterling owns more property in beverly Hills, than the Bundy's own in Nevada.

          • Roger says:

            His family has been running a cattle ranch for over 100 years. And I'm not easily impressed.

            The brand my grandparents had registered was the "rocking A" ranch.

            You have no idea how much work cattle can be.

          • Cow-billy says:

            That surprises me.

            Being it was your family brand, I'd have assumed it was the "Flaming Asshole" brand.

          • Roger says:

            You would.
            But most have better early childhood training.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            Touche.

          • SUA says:

            Racist, bigot, patriot. It shouldn't matter. This isn't a referendum on his personality. If we wait for the perfect poster child to represent the battle between citizens and an overreaching government, we'll be waiting a long time.

            He's not even a perfect representative of the issue, as there were (I assume) equally virtuous ranchers who paid the BLM fees and are no longer in business. Let's leave the guns at home and have a proper conversation about where government leaves off and the rights of the people it serves begin.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well said Mr. Liberty.

            I slam christians alot and very seldom do I run across non- bigoted ones like you.

          • Roger says:

            Yes, you slam Christians, and you never slam them for the things that they might deserve criticism for. You attack them for things they are opposed to, and that their teachings never wanted them to do.

            And then you ignore the other religions that do exactly what you blame on Christianity.

          • Guest says:

            You profess to be Christian Roger.

            How about I slam you for just being downright rude and obnoxious?

            You are.

            Would your Jesus behave the way you behave online? I do not think so.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well said

          • Roger says:

            You've done all the things he just said.

            It's almost like you used a guest profile to pretend both sides of a conversation…..

          • Roger says:

            You 'profess' to be credible as a guest profile.
            How about I just slam you for being a coward and a hack?

            You are.

            And my Jesus doesn't say I have to sit silently while someone lies about my Savior.

          • Guest says:

            Nobody was lying about your Savior.
            Nobody was lying about you.

            They were telling the unvarnished truth.

            You are obnoxious and rude.

            Those are the facts.

            You should be banned from posting here. You should go back to your DrNerdLove sex site.

          • Roger says:

            Oh my, one rude person wants to say everyone else is rude? Which coward are you this time? It's so hard to keep track of all of you.

            And yes, he was lying about my religion. Unless of course you can show where Christ taught the things he says, you're just another bigot throwing mud too. These are the facts.

            You know, when guest profiles are banned here then the adults won't have to work around idiots like yourself.

          • Guest says:

            Roger, Jesus love you, and so don't I.

          • Roger says:

            Still here spamming the place?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            You have 0 creidtability.

            Quit derailing threads

          • Roger says:

            I have more credibility than you do, according to the rep scores. According to the number of followers, and WTE, you are only entitled to your opinions, not your own facts.

          • Guest says:

            Yes.
            We know.

            You have told us 143,000 times that you make excellent posts and are an excellent commenter and you have a sterling reputation.

          • Roger says:

            And you?

            Oh, you're just a coward hiding and spamming from behind a guest profile. Is that because you don't even aim here for your normal low standards?

          • Guest says:

            I don't know if you are a tweedle-dee or a tweedle-dum, but you are pathetic.

          • Roger says:

            Coming from you, it's just more of the same.

            Spam to derail and diminish the site.

            The posse agenda seems to be in full force again today. Why does this site so threaten the posse?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Only because you have posted over a 100,000 comments and followers mean nothing when it comes to credibility. You have none on this site

          • Roger says:

            WTE, you are entitled to your opinion.
            But all that means that I have been around longer on this forum, are accepted by more people on this forum and frankly when you toss mud like that you can expect me to defend my positions.

            And you don't have the credibility to make that call on mine.

            Why? You're here for the posse agenda to target this site. Spam never improves your credibility and having people like today's 'Guest' backing you doesn't make you seem any more credible. It does show how your side works when targeting a site and thread.

          • PoofSheGone says:

            Barking up the wrong tree, so don't quit your day job to become a super sleuth. I stumbled upon your (all of you, not just you) verbal vomit and the pirate's site quite by accident, but then became fascinated by people like yourself who would post 97,000+ comments and say virtually nothing. If you have beliefs, why don't you just state them and be done with it? It's the badgering/stalking that doesn't look, to the casual observer, like it's either healthy or effective. Has either "side" convinced a living soul of your points of view? Not likely. I just couldn't stand another comment about the Breitbart episode….Andrew Breitbart has been dead for 6 months (and thus his site has changed), and yet you continue to drag it out — how old is that comment, BTW? Good luck to you, because with your mindset you're going to need it. Ever think about collecting ping-pong balls or finding an equally interesting hobby?

          • Roger says:

            Here you are, spamming the site still.

            Here you are, hiding like a sniveling coward still.
            And the posse agenda marches on.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I was on this site before you. So everyone following you excepts you? I don't think so and most of those people don't even comment anymore because they got tired of you

          • Roger says:

            And I was on this story before you, and the one before that.

            Why do you think every story you decide to pounce on should be left open to you and the posse derailing the discussion?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I was on the site before you and the only reason you get to stories before me is because you are online 24/7 trolling

          • Roger says:

            And I was on this story before you, and the story before that.

            And you followed me there and stalked me according to your own definition.

            How does that feel?

          • NoBeefMafia says:

            Ah.
            It is all about the "game", huh Rogre? All about who posts first, and who posts last, and how many points they get. If it is all about the points, then in your last thousand posts, you have gotten about 2000 thumbs down.

          • Roger says:

            WTE seems to think so.
            Why don't you go back to his comment and ask him why he thinks being at a site first is like laying a claim to it?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I did not follow you to any of them. I read the stories and the comments and posted my all comments which you trolled and left dumb replies too

          • Roger says:

            Of course you are entitled to that opinion.

            But frankly you and the trash that follows you have been targeting this site for so long with so much mud your comment is dumb.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Self projection is something you do very well.

            Look at what you have done to wreck the site today, not one thing worthly from you on here.

            You're a troll and a POS. It's funny you are trying to sue so many people and pretend to be a victim but yet you harrass myself and them all day and pretend you have some sort of case

          • Roger says:

            More insults and more spam.

            You're of course entitled to your opinion.

            But you pretend to be in a position where you can look down and decide who's the troll.

            You and your cadre of characters seem to be spamming this place with a real determination this morning, that puts you in the thick of this and you're not doing anything but harassing me by calling names.

            According to your own definitions of course. I have other ones since I understand this is debate.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            "But you pretend to be in a position where you can look down and decide who's the troll"

            You think you are in a postion to decide who a troll is since you have insulted several people by calling them that.

          • Roger says:

            Trolls are what they are.

            For example you just posted another comment with nothing in it but insults and personal attacks.

            Just like the rest of your band of characters here derailing any serious discussion of the story.

            That's why I call anyone that does that a troll.

          • guest says:

            Go somewhere else, like the growl, they are welcoming you.

          • Roger says:

            I have a suggestion for where you should go to.

            But it would be off topic and just as much spam as your comment was.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            So by your own definition you are a troll then

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            He has worn out his welcome all over. Two more sites he has been banned from Atheist Revolution and B itch Spot. So add that to Growl, Dr. Nerd, iamanatheist, and Belfast

          • Roger says:

            Still urging the posse on to more personal attacks and another round of spam?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Nope, just stating facts. Why are you banned from so many sites? Are you going to blame everyone else and not except personal responbilities for your actions that git you banned?

          • Roger says:

            There you go again. Your opinion is jus that. You don't get to decide facts.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            So why are you banned from so many sites?

          • Roger says:

            So why are you?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Only like two and I did it on prupose

          • Roger says:

            You always think your excuses justify bad behavior that derails the thread and diminihses th site.

          • Roger says:

            Nope, but I'm not surprised you would say that, it's typical for you.

          • Rogre says:

            Roger, would it make you happy if everyone left here? Then you could post here all by yourself. But that still would not satisfy you. You would follow people to the next site, and start all over again.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            For some reason he thinks he has some authority and gets to decide who the trolls are and what comments should be allowed. Like when he cried about us posting grilling tips. He needs a reality check because as much as he pretends he does not control or get to decide what people talk about. Everyone on here needs to contact the admins and let them know how roger acts and get him banned from here IMO.

          • Roger says:

            For some reason you think that you and your cadre of characters gets to target sites, drive everyone away and then move on like locusts to the next one.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            That is a complete lie. I go to new sites to get away FROM YOU. Yet you continue to harass me from site till site until you get banned.

          • Roger says:

            No, it's not.
            You just can't stand that someone actually debates you and challenges your positions.

            That is the nature of debate.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            You don't debate or challenge anything

          • Roger says:

            Sure I do.

            And how does your comment do either?

            You and your cadre of characters sure is determined to keep working this site over. Why does it threaten your agenda so badly?

          • guest says:

            You don't behave in a Christ like manner, you are a hypocrite.

          • Roger says:

            You don't get to tell me how I'm supposed to act.

            You're not my cleric and I don't have to listen to you twist things around.

            I follow Christ and I will defend His teachings when someone lies about them. Even if you and other coward trolls want to attack and lie about it.

          • Mr. Liberty says:

            Thanks Wee. But this saddens me. I pray a lot that my fellow Christians get back to the roots of our faith. Back to the Gospel. But like our government, it is corrupted in some aspects.

          • Roger says:

            Our media, like the story says tries to put out a false narrative.

            When we allow the media and a hostile secular culture define and limit what we are allowed to do and say, we're listening to the wrong boss.

            We can't hide our light, or let them tone down our salty taste.
            (Matt 5)
            Paul talks about this being warfare, against evil. If Christians expect a walk in the park in a post Christian era, they are going to be sadly disappointed.

          • Guest says:

            Oh wow. Just wow oh wow. Now you are in Condescending Christian Mode. The Perpetual Preacher. The Muslims will have a hard time today. It's time you go off on your Trista-Parsi rant………..

          • Roger says:

            Oh wow. Just wow oh wow.
            Now you are in condescending atheist mode. The insulter.

            The secularists will have a hard time today.

          • Guest says:

            Liberty, if you want to pray for someone, or save someone, start with your boy Roger. He is the poorest excuse for a Christian I have ever seen.

          • Roger says:

            And as a Christian I don't expect to have trolls such as yourself agree with anything I say or do.

            It's a badge of honor.

          • guest says:

            Someday, somebody is going to take that badge of honor, and staple it right between your eyes with a 20 penny spike.

          • Roger says:

            If you want to threaten me man up and do it.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            He is trying to rope you into a law suit. Kind of like entrapment

          • V. Stiviano says:

            Yeah. Like the tranny did to Donald Sterling.

          • Roger says:

            Nope, did she threaten to have something put in his forehead?

          • Roger says:

            He made a statement, if he wants to hint at violence then he might as well just say what he means.

          • Rogre says:

            Why would you assume that poster was a he? It might have been a she. Or it could have been a Missy.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            He assumes all the time

          • Roger says:

            Still spamming and trying to divert from the comment I'm referring to?

          • Roger says:

            And while growling under the bridge what difference does it make to me?

          • Rogre says:

            Goodbye Roger. My well is down, and I have to go fix it. Have fun sitting inside all day.

          • Roger says:

            Zeb, you really just confirmed what I've realized for a while.

            7 hours ago @ http://912wolverines.com/ – The Growl · 1 reply · +4 points
            "My concerns for today:

            Every day we’re faced with outlandish claims and unverifiable statements. Now, more than ever, it’s important to be skeptical on the internet.
            We must verify………………

            I'm out for today. My water well is down for repair. "

            You are a horrible, miserable excuse for a human being.

            You won't allow even normal debate on the growl without your thumb on everything yet you bring dirt here to ruin this site when you won't consider it for your own.

            You are a two faced douche.

          • Guest says:

            I'd bet someone is having a little fun with you.

            Also, please refrain from that coarse language.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            You're welcome. christians would not have such a bad rep if they actually practiced what they preached

          • Roger says:

            And atheists wouldn't have such a bad rap if they didn't go on the attack instead of just not believing and going on about their life without the smears that aren't deserved.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            We don't have a bad rep

          • Roger says:

            Yes, you do. At least in many circles that are tired of the lies and attacks.

            I'd say atheists in general are about as pushy as Jehovah Witness people banging on a door.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            We don't bang on people's doors

            christians do at leat in many circles who are tired of the lies and attacks that christians dish out daily

          • Roger says:

            You've been on the attack and banging on Christians comments here.

            You're entitled to your opinion of course.
            But Christians were patient with you hundreds of times and you were the one that insulted and kept on the attack.

            That's not tolerance and it's not any different than you say Christians are.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I wa snot insulting just explaining with facts why you guys are wrong

          • Roger says:

            You usually brag about being insulting, like you did the other day when you defended being rude to Gentleman John by saying he was no gentleman.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            HE was rude and that is why his rep score was in the negatives

          • Roger says:

            See, you just did it again.
            First you changed your position from you don't insult to you do insult but you think he deserved it.

            And second. No, a negative score on a site hostile to his values only means he didn't have supporters. He wasn't rude, he was brave enough to explain his beliefs.

            And you still just made my point you did attack him (verbally of course) and you just admitted it.

          • HPD says:

            I'll support you

          • ReachAround says:

            You always were an athletic type supporter.

          • Roger says:

            Still more spam.
            You guest trolls need to be banned here.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            HE was rude and that is why he had a negative score. Many other people on that site shared his beleifs and they did not have negative scores

          • Roger says:

            No, he was a gentleman, his name fit.

            You just didn't agree with his Christian values.

            And you just defended your attacks and insults again, proving my point that you do attack and insult.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I didn't insult him I showed why he was wrong and so did many other people and yet he continued his verbal insult against those he hated with a passion. He had a negative score for reason, because he was a troll. Anyways I am not here to discuss him and basically that is just you trying to distract from the story and spam the site

          • Roger says:

            Of course you did.
            And now you've switched from I didn't attack him to 'he deserved it' and back again to 'I didn't attack him'. You did and those comments were pulled since they didn't want personal attacks.

            It was probably one of the reasons they pull your comments when they realize who you are.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            My comments were pulled because you reported them. Pretty simple. I was on BElfast all day yesterday and not one comment was pulled and the mods know who I am. Funny how my comments remain when you are not stalking or know the profile I am using in there

          • Roger says:

            Even if I had, the reason they stayed pulled is because they didn't deserve space there, and you were banned not just because you kept pulling mine, but because you kept showing that you can't debate or discussion in a civil manner, they mentioned as much.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well your comments that were pulled stayed pulled so by your defintion they did not deserve space there. Or is it because they have the site set up so that posters can moderate by the report button and expect the users not to act like a child and report every comment of someone they are harrassing. IF they mentioned that then prove it. I have had several discussions with admin and my comments are welcome as long as I dfon't use a profile you know about

          • Roger says:

            Did you just make all that up, or have you been practicing it?

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            All I said was truthful

          • Roger says:

            Except for the things you left out. Like your insults, your pulling comments and your being banned because they had enough of you.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            My comments were pulled becaus eyou reported them moron. I was just there and was there all day yesterday (getting a break form your harrassment) and al my comments are still up. Any more lies you want to make up?

          • Roger says:

            Letr's see, what you say now vs what they said at the time? I'll go with the m and what they said at the time.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Well I never saw that they said that and the conversations I have had with them are different from what you are claiming. So prove they said that and don't try and say prove they didn't it really makes you look more retarded than you alreadty are

          • Roger says:

            You may have posted under a disguise, but not under your name. Hiding in the shadows, when they figure out who you are, guess what they'll do.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            I am using an old profile on there that YOu don't know about and they know who I am

          • Roger says:

            Not withyour name and avitar. So, you're snaeking in without them knowing. YOu knoww hat will happen when you are found out.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You still haven't met one.

          • Roger says:

            Is that the best insult you can do?

            It's almost as if the posse has been targeting this site for so long that you're recycling yourselves and your mud now.

            This site won't cave, it won't stop the great stories and you have done all the damage you as a group can inflict on it.

            Isn't it time to realize you're all a failure and move on like a swarm of locusts to another site?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            That's you.

          • Roger says:

            Why bother with more, you and the posse don't deserve much more effort.

            And why are you all so determined to keep chipping away at this site?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            You are.

          • Roger says:

            Aw, I'm shocked. More spam from you, I'm just surprised!

            You normally, ummm, never mind.

            Just more of your typical spam.

          • SUA says:

            Rich old @sshole hooks up with gold digging hottie. There are no heroes. Nothing else to see here … move along.

          • Guest says:

            ………and everyone is surprised at the outcome. She was sucking the gold from him, one nugget at a time.

  10. Guest says:

    Mr. Thomas, excellent thought provoking article. Thank you for your input.

    • Fraiser says:

      I notice that in one of the last paragraphs it makes mention of Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilley, Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart. They are all in the exclusive club, of being monitored, and disseminating Government Approved Information. I am surprised that the Author did not go further and dig into the old Breitbart organization. It is obvious to anyone paying attention that Stephen K. Bannon is a Government Plant. That was obvious even before Breitbart died. Bannon was Breitbarts "Handler".

      • TheNewsMadd says:

        Breitabrt was good at misleading information

        • Roger says:

          Brietbart was great at going into topics most feared to examine.
          Of course if you don't like the site then you don't have to bother reading it.

          • Frasier says:

            Roger, get the f*ck away from me. You do not have to post to me. You do not have to talk to me, you do not have to answer me. Your comment was nothing but an attempt to derail my original comment. It was not even related to the topic. I made the statement above that Steven Bannon was a Government Plant and that he was Breitbarts "handler". That statement directly corresponds to the meat of this article.

            How do you respond?

            Of course if you don't like the site then you don't have to bother reading it.

            A f*cking retarded child with a third grade education could have made the same type response as you have made.

            If you can't make an intelligent comment, then simply shut the hell up, and get the f*ck out of here.

            We are all tired of your nonsense.

          • Roger says:

            Deceptive editing is done all the time on the left.
            And to have their own tactics used against them frankly seems pretty fair to me. If was really deceptive editing. If they were lied about they can take legal action, so far they just scream and pretend that Andrew was barking up the wrong tree.
            Project Veritas has been chewing them up, ask Acorn.

          • Roger says:

            Fraiser, even if you have your personal angst, Brietbart did take down Acorn.
            Something we all them a debt of thanks.

            And of course, if you don't want to post in the same forum that I post in, there are other ones that I'm sure would welcome you. Of course since you are new with a convenient unknown name and no comment stream I don't have a clue what specifics to suggest.

          • Frasier says:

            You do not articulate your thoughts in a straightforward and concise manner. Spending too much time on those lewd sex sites that have banned you? You appear muddled and confused.

          • Roger says:

            There you go again. Pretending to be someone outside the posse so you can act as if you had credibility while spamming the place. You don't belong here.

          • Guest says:

            There you go again. Pretending to be relevant. Give it up.

          • Roger says:

            Give up what? Wanting to come to this site and discuss the story topics the authors provide?

            Perhaps the posse isn't relevant and can't destroy this site and needs to move along to a site more their style.

          • guest says:

            Stalking Wee again?

          • Roger says:

            By his own definition you're stalking me.

            I of course accept the legal standard and realize that my using the designed features of the forum isn't stalking.

    • ForwardObserver says:

      Mr. Thomas seems to be "in the know" and well connected. Which would lead to the next obvious question. Is Michael Thomas a CIA Asset? He wrote a serious of very informative articles about the CIA Coup in the Ukraine. There sure seems to be a lot of Machiavellian Cloak and Dagger drama going on in the world today.

  11. SUA says:

    This is a fun story – MSM is an easy target. But I've gotta ask … where's the proof of CIA control? Absent that, it's a theory that simply adds to dismissals of alternate media as pandering to or populated with conspiracy theorists.

    • cosmicconvergence2012 says:

      SUA, perhaps you might read the Reference links at the end of the article.

      They present clear and conclusive evidence of CIA control of the MSM.

      "The CIA and the Media" http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=5012

      • SUA says:

        I shouldn't have to go through a half-dozen source articles in search of a smoking gun that supports the very bold claim made above – if evidence exists, put it in the story.

        Your linked article is largely a reprint of a pretty famous Rolling Stone story from 1977 that does not support the claims made here, even without the 37 year gap.

        CIA controls our media? That's huge news! Wonder why CBS, CNN or NBC haven't covered it.

  12. Guest says:

    Slow news day……….

  13. Guest says:

    Anthony Gucciardi, unless and until you formally ban the "Roger" character from your website, it will continue to flounder. I like your website. I especially like Michael Thomas articles. They are excellent. But this "Roger "character detracts from all the good work done here. He drives people away from here.

    He is a pox on your house.

    • Roger says:

      Why is it that this site does just fine until WTE and his cadre of characters shows up to spam the place?

      You are the pox, and I hope all of the posse wanders away sooner rather than later.

      • Alinsky Hero USA says:

        Because you don't post here until WTE does.

        • Roger says:

          I had one of the first comments here and even beat your comment by 40 minutes.

          Want to make up another lie?

          • Guest says:

            Shut up. I had the first comment at the top of the thread.

          • Roger says:

            Guest, I realize you want to act as if you are not part of this spamming.
            It's not working and I posted an early comment 40 minutes before Alinksy did.

            I don't care how loudly you squeal, it doesn't change the facts. And why do you as a guest profile anyone can use sound like more than one person?

          • Guest says:

            Shut the f*ck up.
            You have not posted one comment here pertaining to the topic of the article. You ruin every thread that you show up on. Go back to babbling about Cliven Bundy. You, and Mr. Lincoln and HPDuuuh….. are the last three imbeciles left supporting him. I'm amazed you aren't supporting Donald Sterling.

          • Roger says:

            Why Guest, you really are dense, aren't you. Are you so determined to spam the place you overlook the comments on the story?

            Check towards the bottom of the thread. I was the 5th or 6th comment on the story. And then the time index. Why so bitter, is it because the site continues to be the great source of stories that scare this regime?

            Why don't you and the entire posse just ignore one story and see how normal things can be without you. No rants about needing revolution or stored ammo caches. No calling for all pigs to die…

            Does that just drive you all nuts?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Your OCD obsession to be the first, last, and the most to comment, is the reason your are a pox on this site. That, and your comments are always completely wrong and uninformed, mainly taken from email hoaxes. .

          • Guest says:

            He is a child. A small, petulant child, with a weak mind, suffering from OCD.

            His comments are not good, and they are not excellent. He never comments on topic. It is always flamethrowing and derailing.

            He still supports Cliven Bundy and the Beef Mafia. As usual, Roger is on the wrong side of history.

            He probably even supports Donald Sterling.

          • Roger says:

            I notice you never discuss the topic.
            I notice alinsky under any guise has OCD and always goes after my comments.

            And you probably support the posse here working to diminish this site.

          • Guest says:

            Roger, do you remember a while back, when the author of this article, Michael Thomas came to a thread, and told everybody to STFU!?

            Do you remember that?

            I'll refresh you.

            STFU!

          • Roger says:

            I remember twice someone pretended to be the moderator.

            And as you recall the author saying to 'can it'.

            But yet, here you are with the posse spamming the place still.

          • Administrator says:

            Can it, asshole.

          • Roger says:

            You can pretend, but you can't fake the blue name when you impersonate the admin.

            And why don't you can the foul language?

          • BlueManGroup says:

            You mean like the Blue that Zebrano uses to can you?

          • Roger says:

            Speak for yourself. Why don't you spam there for a while? Or is this site more of a threat to your posse and it's agenda?

          • BlueManGroup says:

            I continue to post there under my normal avitar. I continue to post on DrNerdLoves under "Guest". How about you? Banned from both places, huh? That is what is wrong with you. People like you are the reason everyone continues to vote D&R.

          • Roger says:

            Am I? Is that relevant here?

            Are you banned and Navy's site and Speak out?
            People like you, you sound like a certain basketball team owner.

            What is wrong with you, are you just cranky since spamming the place here isn't working?

          • guest says:

            Stalking Alinski?

  14. Mr.Lincoln says:

    Corporatocracy: How the Corporate Welfare State Divides and Conquers

    A small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy. You couldn't ask for a more perfect system of control.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez8I8VGLNUw#t=35

    U.S. Gives Russia Free Military Equipment Used By Army, Marines March 26, 2014

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/03/u-s-giv

    • Roger says:

      Yes, I posted that link on another story here at this site.

      A couple of things to notice. It was reported on a UK site, not in our media.
      And the deputy was fired, the Sheriff is facing election and buckled to pressure on it.

    • DoubleStandard says:

      Great link. Thanks!

      • Guest says:

        He does have a double standard, doesn't he? He criticizes people for doing the same things he does. He thinks he is above reproach. This place needs to be a Roger Free Zone.

        • Roger says:

          No, it needs to be a guest free zone. The story link I posted on a story about police abuse goest to the heart of that story.

          Your comments? Not so much.

    • TheNewsMadd says:

      This is BS and has to stop.

      • Guest says:

        Yes. It is deplorable, the lengths that policemen have gone to.

        • TheNewsMadd says:

          Protect and Serve has been replaced with Fine and Arrest.

          Giving police quotas to meet was not a good idea

          • Roger says:

            Police don't have quotas, and if that motto has been replaced then that dept head needs to be replaced. One town, one department at a time.

            But we can't forget the training officers. As long as the new officers are taught to be arrogant the problems won't go away.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Sure they do. One was fired for speaking out against the quotas and it was reported in Story Leak:
            http://www.storyleak.com/police-officer-fired-tic

          • Roger says:

            Ticket quotas.
            That isn't the same as you seemed to be implying.
            They don't have quotas in all areas of their job, like "Abuse and arrest three old ladies…"

            And if the local community funds a department then they don't depend on revenue for traffic citations. It's a local issue.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Knock it off. They have their quotas to meet. Not gonna engage in endless back and forth with you so you can wreck the thread. I showed they have quotas and you said they did not. You were wrong

          • Guest says:

            Yeah.
            There is Roger, being rude and disagreeable first thing this morning. What a piece of work.

          • Roger says:

            this is you, a coward throwing mud first thing this morning.

            What a piece of something else you are.

          • Guest says:

            Woah there little fellow. Calm down. You are almost on the verge of swearing.

          • Roger says:

            Not a worry, I wouldn't stoop to the level some others depend on.

          • TheNewsMadd says:

            Yeah it's getting old. Can't have a single discussion on here without getting trolled and harrassed by him. Not sure why he hates this site so much. Gonna try and go back to ignoring the troll. I think we all should it's not fair to the site and the people who want serious discussion

          • Roger says:

            It was old the first time I read you attacking Christianity even continuing after dozens had taken the time to explain why you were wrong.

            It never deterred you though.

          • Roger says:

            WTE, you don't get to tell me when I'm allowed to disagree with you.

            That's debate, and that's the risk you take on this forum.
            Local agencies that force their departments to depend on citation revenue set themselves up for that kind of criticism.

            And citation dependence is a sort of quota, but it doesn't tie the hands of how the officers treat citizens. Abuse is abuse and totally independent of the abuse issues this site focuses on.

          • Guest says:

            Rogre, why can't wee all just get along? Even Alinsky extended the olive branch, when he made the new avitar with the testes on it.

          • Roger says:

            Why do you just have to post spam here?

      • Roger says:

        Like the case In Tennessee, local elections and local citizens pushing back can solve this in a non violent way. But citizen involvement is critical.

  15. Guest says:

    Those two people in the photo? I have seen them before, in Wal-Mart. The fat woman tried to run me over on her motorized food scooter. She was making a mad dash for the Cheetos.

  16. Mr.Lincoln says:

    Youtube Censorship Meets It's Match

    Apr 29, 2014 In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with Stafan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio about the recent temporary shutdown of his youtube channel which came just days after giving a majorly politicized speech in Amsterdam.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkofsPwkz24

  17. Mr. Liberty says:

    Song of the day! The Seed. A New Season. Enjoy! Great message.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9JCk3yHFNk

  18. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    Roger 173p · 53 minutes ago

    I'm holding my own

  19. Moleman says:

    CIA-control? Maybe; maybe not. I'd say pro big-government communistic Zionist control, 'cause they're the ones who own and control the media- and they need no prodding from the CIA, as their agendas are the same.

  20. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    HAPPY MAY DAY EVERYONE!!!!!!!

  21. MartianTiger says:

    lapdog media are as relevant as cordwainers in 2014, but they have the support of the political-journalist-bureaucrat class of which they are part.

    Therefore their final demise will not be gradual but violent, as a series of incidents exposes them and shakes the apathy off their consumer victims, to be replaced by irrational hatred of them.

    Then the apathy will return and new tyrants will re-enslave the mouthbreathers of the underclass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *