Are You Living in a Fourth Amendment Exclusion Zone?

February 24th, 2013
Updated 04/08/2013 at 8:45 pm

Major cities like New York City, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and even Houston have been declared by the Department of Homeland Security to be within the official 100 mile ‘border’ of the United States, subjecting 197 million citizens to electronic belonging searches without any suspicion.

It all started in 2008, when the DHS declared that certain ‘border control agents’ could search the electronic belongings of individuals without suspicion — let alone a warrant. Bypassing the rights provided by the Constitutional to every citizen of the United States, the DHS immediately came under fire for the policy. The response? The DHS promised to have the policy reviewed within 120 days. The catch? The review was done two years late and by their own review panel known as the Civil Liberties Impact division.

Absent of any independent input in their secretive review, the DHS published a brief document stating that the suspicionless search policy was perfectly reasonable. Laptops, cell phones, camcorders, and all other gadgets were open game for the DHS within the ‘borders’ of the country.

Entire States Swallowed By DHS ‘Border’

As you can see in the image below provided by the ACLU which highlights the 100 mile radius established by the ridiculous DHS policy, the 197 million individuals living on this outlandishly-extensive ‘border’ accounts for nearly 2/3 of the entire nation’s population. From Washington D.C. to the entire state of Florida (thanks to its coastal positioning), the massive ‘border’ suffocates most of the major cities within the US — and most likely your home.

fourth amendment free zone dhs

And chances are you won’t be hearing about in on the nightly news. That is unless the alternative media forces major news networks to cover it as has been successfully done in the past. What’s more is that the DHS has failed to even outline why they decided to uphold the policy, and has used the tired excuse of ‘national security’ as a defense from publishing their data beyond the brief document. In fact, the DHS claims that upholding the Constitution would actually be harmful to the public. In the explanation as to why these searches are necessary throughout virtually every major city, the DHS states:

“…Imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits…”

What civil rights or civil liberties benefits? The report says nothing. It does fail to mention how the Fourth Amendment already imposes a ‘requirement’ that officers have reasonable suspicion before going through the belongings of any individual from New York City to Houston, however.

As of now, the ACLU has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain more information from the DHS, and are engaged in a lawsuit after the DHS searched an individual and detained him through the use of this policy.

If the DHS has no problem coming after the Fourth Amendment despite operating under the Constitution as the supreme law of the land, will DHS offocials have any trouble coming after another amendment as well? Will the DHS uphold all of its constant injustices through internal reviews that don’t even provide details into the analysis? The fact of the matter is that if we allow the DHS to trample over the Fourth Amendment through suspicionless searches, it is inevitable that they will push even harder in their next policy update.

Share Button

Tags: , , , ,

Category: Constitution, US

About the Author ()

Google Plus Profile Anthony Gucciardi is the creator of Storyleak, accomplished writer, producer, and seeker of truth. His articles have been read by millions worldwide and are routinely featured on major alternative news websites like the infamous Drudge Report, Infowars, NaturalNews, G Edward Griffin's Reality Zone, and many others. He is also a founding member of the third largest alternative health site in the world,

Comments (452)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. carlwk3c says:

    With apologies to Forest Gump … "Tyrants are as tyrants do."

  2. Jaan says:

    The DHS exhibits unbelievable arrogance in its "border" demarcation and in its arbitrary snooping of citizens' electronic files. It is something beyond toleration.

  3. disturbed&confused says:

    Can someone explain how this works. How might someone be stopped and detained for a search of electronic posessions?

    • If you are living in or traveling through one of the major cities, towns, or highways within the 100 mile 'border', under these regulations Department of Homeland Security (not the regular police) can simply stop you without suspicion. In other words, for doing nothing wrong. They can then search all of your electronic belongings.

      When I say 'can', by the way, it is allowed under this new policy. It is not, however, allowed under the Fourth Amendment and that is how the lawsuit stated from the ACLU following the usage of this policy.

      • ACLUCop says:

        Anthony, I am a police officer in Columbus, Ohio. I am outraged, but have to do a bit more research because I worry you might have missed something because you misstated (more liberally) what right you have with the 4th amendment against search and seizure (not that it will matter to Homeland Security, but need to make sure you understand the 4th amendment).

        You stated "It does fail to mention how the Fourth Amendment already imposes a ‘requirement’ that officers have reasonable suspicion before going through the belongings of any individual"…

        Actually, the 4th amendment requires MORE than reasonable suspicion for a search. It requires the more stringent "probable cause" element(s). Reasonable Suspicion, established with Terry vs. Ohio in 1964, allows a "pat down" of a person based on reasonable suspicion, NOT a full blown search, and NOT a search of a car, belongings, etc. Probable Cause is when the officer can articulate more than just suspicious activity (the basis for a personal pat down), but actual evidence the a crime is occurring or occurred (i.e., blood trail, statements made, etc). Just wanted to be clear on that. still researching to make sure outrage is not only righteous, but our civic duty to fight it.

        • kevin says:

          ACLUCOP big surprise you thrown up 1 of the biggest criminal underminings that police have used for the last 30 years to rape and pillage the citizens of this country. you and I both know being an officer, that anytime you want to spin a web to get cause and reasonable suspicion ,you can do whatever you want . detain arrest search SEIZURE excetera excetera. that is why the supreme court now in the last 2 years has went against you police officers to change the way you can search and pull people over . unfortunately it almost takes a court ruling in the Supreme Court to change any actions that you have on the local, county , and state levels. also if you think this is wrong just going to Texas New Mexico Arizona at 1 of the Border Patrol check check stations ,which some are up to over 150 miles off of the borderand just try to decline answering any of their questions . see how well that works out for you while you’re being illegally detained ,and questions for being a quote un quote terrorist of the country . our country is a joke. our chosen law officials, I think that they can pass whatever lost they want regardless of what people in their districts believe , the proof is this is the GM and Chrysler bailout 80 percent of the country didn’t want that to go through, but alas it went through all under the explanation that our fine Society needed stabilization growth and we couldn’t lose these brands . then you have all of our local and state law enforcement agencies to become nothing more than a revenue generator , aka attacking and taxing its citizens to the point of non recognition and compliance. We are in trouble and if you don’t think so you are either blind or getting a handout .

          • RTZ says:

            RTFP before you attack, Kevin. ACLU cop was clarfying the 4th IN SUPPORT of this thread, not against it. Allways be sure of your target and what's behind it before you shoot…basic gun safety, generally applicable.

        • EndCorporatocracy says:

          Hey, bud!

          Please consider joining Oathkeepers:

  4. Steve says:

    Perhaps we should all keep some interesting fake data on our electronic devices for the DHS boobs to discover, such as odd phone contacts – I suggest Colonel Mustard (remember the old board game Clue?) or actual DHS employees so they'll wonder if those are loyal, or like secret plans to invade Mars, or a scheme to overthrow the government by using jello, or even status reports of how we have successfully infiltrated the DHS with lots of our own people. LOL, that should make them sweat a bit and go on some wild goose chases! Of course keep any actual private data protected in encrypted folders. LOL, this is almost too easy and fun, like how Bo and Luke used to turn the tables on Boss Hogg and Sheriff Roscoe P. Coltrane on the old TV sitcom The Dukes of Hazzard.

    • joe says:

      I wouldn't be so cheeky if I were you. By (US) law, you are required
      to provide the password to your encrypted data to the authorities, or
      else DHS can put you behind bars.

      • Bob says:

        By US law, you are required to void your rights? A suspect is one thing. Thinking you're suspicious is not grounds for a warrant-less search.

      • Ronald Smith says:

        Wow, it’s clear that you don’t know US law very well. Have fun with that.

      • Steve says:

        I doubt that DHS authorities have the legal power to require you to provide a password to your encrypted data at the risk of imprisonment. That goes against our right to remain silent and not incriminate ourselves. However, it would still be fun to entertain such a DHS boob's request for a password. Waste a bunch of time by trying to remember the password ("I know it has something to do with my dog's name, or maybe it was related to my favorite dish… Yeah, I might have used "vermicelli" or "spaghetti". Wait, how many h's are in spaghetti? Do you like Italian food? I really like chicken cacciatore but I knew I'd never remember how to spell that. Wait, I think I remember; I graduated in 1987, so let's try Spaghetti1987…. darn, that didn't work. Oh, you're stressing me out here; I can't remember!"). Have a lot of encrypted folders with suspicious names, and stumble over all the passwords. Manage to get into one of them and find that it has an email with the message "Gotcha!". In other encrypted folders have some corny knock-knock jokes. Have fun with this sport. It is definitely not an imprisonable offense to be in possession of encrypted data for which you don't recall the password. If they insist otherwise, tell them the password and insist that it is correct, but you don't know why it is not working.

        • Leonidas says:

          Though I don't live in one of those areas, I do have a little something cooked up all the same. I have a laptop loaded with the most disturbing and disgusting porn from Germany I could find on the internet. The entire HDD is crammed full of it, and none of the file names or folders give any indication as to what they are. They're all given names innocuous enough to be suspicious…

          • Joe says:

            You realize that nothing keeps you from having an application that randomly fills a partition up with randomly (possibly) encrypted files and making it so that no metadata other than filenames and paths exist, right? I seem to remember… started and ended with a T I think. Hmm, better stick to 7.1. Although you might want to double-check the SHA checksum. 😉
            You could actually buy a 2TB HDD, format it this way, and already have it at 99% used capacity. It's going to be interesting to see what comes up as a replacement for TrueCrypt. Some prefer LUKS. BitLocker is a joke since it came from the same people who gave us MS-CHAP 1&2. Can you say deliberate weaknesses? I'm sure you can.

            The entire point is that even if I gave you 10 passwords, you'd not know for sure if there's an 11th. If the passwords are memorable… See, that's the only flaw. It's really easy to lose a lot of data.

    • Marc says:

      I have my mom saved on my phone as "Osama Bin Laden". … I suppose I should probably update that to someone who's still alive.

    • Lucy says:

      Like this?

  5. InvaluableInfo says:

    Seems like the government expansion is continuing at an even faster pace. This department has been an atrocity to the constitution since its inception. We have now progressed from a crawl to a walk to a run towards tyranny. If you say that though you must be a conspiracy theorist. Even though their own actions show they are planing to remove every protection and freedom they can.

  6. Mike says:

    I say if they take one amendment away we get to make up one on the spot.

    • @Norton1776 says:

      Well… Let me think. I kind-a have my first? and my 2nd is on my hip (+)… what is the third again? My 2nd never really get's me to consider all the others!!! If done right?

  7. Roland says:

    Some entire countries would be swallowed up by that "border". What a bunch of criminals making a law like that.

    • Hagar says:

      Ahhh Shucks Roland, the DHS is set up to protect you from outside invasion errrrrr sorry, they cannot do that might anger some muslims or illegals. Darn. They are set up to control the US population, oh heck that has been done already by brainwashing and pussification. Maybe they are there to protect you from terrorist acts like the boston hit, oh heck, where in the heck were they. My point is that the US and its corrupt govt agencies have become a joke to the people of the US and other nations.

      • Security Bear says:

        I don't like that talk, Hagar. It sounds like tare-o-wist talk! Don't you understand that we do this out of wuuuuuv?

  8. rjg says:

    Please send this to Colbert and/or John Stewart, at this point they are probably our best chance of getting the word out to the masses and forcing the mainstream press to cover this BS.

    • imNOTdeceived says:


    • rjg: Just don't expect Stewart to support your interest in the Second Amendment–the functional teeth of the First. Like many who lean to the Left the has a blind spot when it comes to guns. It is hard to understand; in all other matters he seems so intelligent that it is hard to imagine that he thinks guns kill people and should be put into special gun prisons. His humor is so profoundly serious it is strange that he is so illogical in this matter. The Second is about protecting oneself and one's community against the tyranny of big government. Google: "democide" to see how many people have been killed by their own governments in the 20th Century.
      P. S. Liberal Naomi Watts (is it Wattsor Wolf?) had her awakening since she joined the lawsuit against the NDAA and realized then the practical reasons for a Second Amendment. Funny how people, otherwise intelligent, only see this when they are personally threatened. The mind should be able to make the connections without being personally involved; I mean, universals are actually that universals and apply to all, eh?

  9. Jessika says:

    i want to see a link of this "report" they have done.

  10. Eemgoch8 says:

    Encrypt your shit. It makes a statement. It also protects you from that lowest bidder government contractor sifting through your personal data.

    • There's a key for every lock. I don't think decoding data could be a problem nowadays. Although lack of privacy can feel uncomfortable, but if you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't be afraid of anything.

  11. EJW says:

    I do hope this info gets to the President, the Congress, and the Supreme Court.
    I'm pretty sure that they would ALL agree that bypassing the Forth Amendment in this fashion is criminal.

    What the Forth Amendment protects us from, search & seizure without due cause, was one of the BIG issues that sent us to war with Britain. Does the DHS want the citizens of the USA to rebel against them and thus the US Government as it says we SHOULD do in the Declaration of Independence when the government no longer works FOR the people?

    • Rufus says:


    • AndrewC says:

      You really think the President, Congress, and the Supreme Court don't know about this? They don't care about your rights. Congress will gladly strip us of all of our rights if it benefits them. They'll just make sure there's a clause that says the new law doesn't apply to them, just like they've done with everything else.

      • Ronald Smith says:

        Precisely! Some people have no clue who’s actually creating this drivel. There’s no way those people listed give a crap about this, they’re the ones who made it happen. Telling them about it would only give them confirmation of our awareness to the fact, nothing else.

    • Adam says:

      That's fighting talk!

    • You need to WAKE UP!!!! The left had control of both the House and Senate starting in 2006, and they have been blatantly assaulting our Constitutionally protected, God given rights ever since. Now you add to the mix an Illegal Usurper in the White House, and covert left wingers pretending to be Conservatives and committing open treason against those that put them in power…and here we are!!! The time for any Peaceful Resolution to this matter is all but gone!!!

  12. LinkoWinko says:

    I say we protect our 4th amendment rights (and all other rights granted to us by the constitution) by exercising our 2nd amendment rights :)

  13. arb says:

    Interesting how the DHS appears to have ceded all of the Great Lakes to Canada, because otherwise Chicago isn't even close to being a "border" city.

  14. canyounot says:

    what in the actual shit. no.

  15. Avalon says:

    What's the source of this information?

  16. Craig. says:

    Americans deserve to be restricted in everyway possible, as long as 'they' are preventing you from leaking out into the rest of the world, I am all for it.

    • Jocelyne says:

      You do understand that the U.S is supposed to be the "land of the free." How in Chuck's name does restricting us in every way possible make this the "land of the free"?

      • Ronald Smith says:

        Because “Craig” is a commie piece of dirtbag anal scum, that’s how. Don’t worry, “he” is just a disinformative troll who has nothing better to do than to distract people on the web with stupid comments that attract attention. It’s called “attention-whoring”. Just ignore it and move on. :)

    • David Strider says:

      What is it that you have so bad against America?
      And please give us a valid reason, otherwise your comment, and what you might reply with would just be a waste of space and typing energy.

  17. Kate says:

    Oh thank goodness, finally border control will be able to address the national security threat that is Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Those ne'er do wells have been squeezing through a Constitutional loophole for too long!

  18. Arb says:

    It's the same thing as airport security. Don't like it? Don't cross the border.

    • I'm in Philadelphia. I'm no where NEAR a border that can be crossed easily.

    • Ame says:

      I didn't know Austin, Texas was the border to Mexico. Idiot.

    • kenroar says:

      My home town is in northern Indiana and nowhere near any border. I didn't realize I was crossing any kind of border when I visit my home town. Now be a good low information voter and go back to the Huffington Post where most of you haunt.

    • Sitting on Arb says:

      Attitudes like that are absolutely pathetic and stupid. "Don't like it? Don't do this necessity then. Problem solved".

      Absolute moron

  19. Homer says:

    Um Arb…. this is NOTHING like airport "security". This doesn't mention anything about crossing a border. You are impacted by simply BEING near a border. READ. Hope you like some random gov't employee reading your emails….

  20. Sean says:

    I didn't know the Canadian border extended throughout Lake Michigan.

  21. Alan says:

    And here's what DHS is using their unrestrained power to do.

    "Homeland Security Seizes 70+ Websites for Copyright and Trademark Violations"

    That's right. They claim they do this for our security but they are using the information to enforce commercial interests.

    I'm all for legitimate property rights, but we can't sacrifice our privacy to protect our property rights. We can't allow the authorities to go on endless fishing expeditions. The probable cause standard was created by the founders for very good reasons.

  22. John Smith says:

    anyone ever read Little Brother by Cory Doctorow?


  23. Hard Case says:

    When they finally come for my guns, they can have my ammo too.

    • PoofShesGone says:

      Oh, I see what you did there, Mr. Case (*wink, wink*)…very clever. Is your son's name Justin?

      • Roger says:

        Very clever there, find a new person to drive away before he can make more intelligent comments?

        Saggy, you are so predictable.

        • PoofShesGone says:

          You are NOT that phucking dumb, are you moron? That "new person" you've got your thong twisted up your gay butt about posted that comment 80 weeks ago, fool. Do you seriously believe he's worried about getting driven away? So this was comment #162,012 — chop, chop, you overslept and have plenty of catching up to do. Oh, and just so you know (since yes, you ARE that phucking dumb), today is Wednesday, October 1, 2014….30 more days til you can show off your PunkinButt to all the neighborhood kiddies. Perv.

          • Roger says:

            Saggy, you're nto a cranky witch, you're just a bitter old thing. You were probably even old, with lumps in places that were never intended even 80 weeks ago. Do you seriously believe that a comment about ideas has to be done in a hurry? Do yo seriously think you can drive me away?

            All these insults, chop chop, try to make them clever or something.

          • trustfunded says:

            "Saggy, you're nto a cranky witch…"
            "Do yo seriously think you can drive me away?"

            Well said.

  24. anonymouse says:

    will DHS offocials have any trouble coming after another amendment as well?

    Read more:

  25. BobtheGrape says:

    In the middle of the article about Homeland Suxcurity there appears this:

    Homeland Security Career?

    Earn your homeland security degree. Find more information here!

  26. Getitright says:

    The map is incorrect. For example. Raleigh NC is more than a hudred miles from the coast.

  27. Paul Revere JR says:

    Time for a repeat of 1776!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "The Tyrants are Coming! The Tyrants are Coming!!!!!

    • PoofShesGone says:

      Dude — your finger got stuck on the exclamation mark key. Time to clean the 'sticky' out of your keyboard. Naughty-shame on you.

      • Roger says:

        Saggy, he was emphasizing a point. Something that the posse trolls just can't understand since you seem to enjoy marxism and this fascist regime.

        • trustfunded says:

          Well said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Oh, man — you don't think I offended Paul Revere JR, do you? He just stopped by 65 weeks ago to 'emphasize a point', so I'm sure he's going to see my mean ol' comment.

            EDIT: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Roger says:

            Oh man, were you heavier than Paul Revere's horse back then?

            I knew you were old, and suspected you were heavy… but that old?

          • PoofShesGone says:


          • Roger says:

            Is that the number of shrimp you can eat at a single feeding frenzy?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Is it true Roger is making death threats about you?

            I knew it was just a matter of time.

            And time has told us.

            He will make any excuse for why it is self defense, but actually he is actively thinking of killing someone.

          • Roger says:

            Is it true that you're ignoring my comment to jump to flawed conclusions?

            And you will make any excuse for making comments like the one you just posted with no evidence to support anything.

            I think you're actively taking steps to hide so you can continue stalking me.

          • Iremember says:

            Pull an all-nighter again last night Roger, honey?
            You have slowed down this week.
            Last week, Friday through Friday, you averaged a tad over two hundred posts per day. At the current rate, you are going to fall far short of your quota. Pick up the pave a bit, you still have about thirty hours to go.

          • Roger says:

            Pulling a no brain-er again alinsky?

            Still can't remember anything?
            Still can't actually discuss anything?

            Still the zombie troll that can't find a brain for the master?

          • PoofShesGone says:

            He didn't slow down enough — he's phucking crazy.

          • Roger says:

            You say that to all the men who are smart enough to escape you.

            Perhaps if you treat yourself to a nice new haircut you'll be in a better mood.
            Do you normally go here?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I will inform the Reno Police Department about his death threats on you and tell them that he is stalking Joe Allen.

          • Roger says:

            Still ignoring the actual comments so you can pretend you have a conclusion?

            You never have contacted any PD and you won't, you're too scared to expose yourself, cowards are like that.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I went back and read his comment.

            It was a definite death threat.

            He is angry and bitter and he is ready to kill somebody.

            I made an anonymous report to the Reno Police department.

            I'm sure glad he doesn't know who I am, and never will. He wants to murder me.

          • Roger says:

            If you had read my comment, you'd realize it's nothing of the sort.

            Trolls you pretend to come to all sorts of conclusions only because it pushes your agenda to stop real discussion at this site.

            Saying I'm up to self defense is only a threat if she intends to attempt harming me.

            And who is the one that makes threats? It's laid out in my litigation as I carefully watch and catch one small mistake at a time.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            here is a the death threat Roger made on Poof, and we finally get to see Roger be arrested.

            Roger says:
            October 2, 2014 at 12:40 am
            "I already have, and you break my leg I defend myself. It's true you have a lot of padding, all I need to do is aim low, you have all the important body parts sagging nearly to the ground."

          • Roger says:

            Wow, that's the best you can do? Self defense would mean I was being attacked or in danger, and it's not illegal to defend yourself.

            So, you're still an empty hack with nothing but the cowardice to hide and lurk like a cockroach.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Physical threats are illegal.

          • Roger says:

            Thank goodness, so will saggy not talk about my legs being broken then?

          • TheRealJoeAllen says:

            My lawyer wants me to ask you for your girlfriend's email address. She is going to be sued along with you for all the libel and harassment.

            Please provide it for me in your reply.

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, you have my attorney contact information. Send the request to him.

          • TheRealJoeAllen says:

            Sir! You may address me as Mr. Joe Allen!

            And I am asking again. I need your girlfriend's email address to send the subpoena information.

            Immediately please. You may also send a boyfriend's email. I understand you read romance novels.

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky can you explain why a black landlord having a slum building and black people dying tragically is a race issue?

  28. j2saret says:

    I see the ACLU was raising the alarm back in 2008. A little late to the party arn't you? BTW who was president in 2008. Which partry had the majority?

  29. pearler says:

    Hmm,it did not work for england,it did not work for napolean,it did not work for hitler,iTIs working for russia @ the time being.
    If the ones We the People,not sheeple,nor pequins,choose to Represent Our CONSTITUTION and LAWS do knot;).
    Then vote them out,erase their names and financial abilities and continue onward:).
    There ya go,cain't git no simpler;).Sea?

  30. jesusknight says:

    The ACLU can go screw themselves.. My Constitutional rights are not legally abrogated by YOU, they are endowed by my Creator and my countries founding documents. The Constitution is the law of the land whether you like it or not.

  31. vintagemodern81 says:

    I suspect that this is part of a larger build-up for the State to seize all power, whether through the imposition of of martial law or some other prevaricative mechanism.. I'm speaking in terms of something like the old analogy of the frog placed in a pot of tepid water where in the water is heated in slow measure resulting in an amphibian that is cooked before the hapless critter is even aware of such.

  32. PooHitsFan says:

    Sorry for this but, as earlier posted about North Carolina, Michigan is also covered and its almost 200 mi across at its widest point. Also, Lake Michigan is entirely within the US boundary.

  33. click says:

    I like what you guys are usually up too. Such clever work and exposure!

    Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve included you guys to my


  34. eggmaster says:

    Thanks for sharing! great post!!

  35. It is featured with a carry handle, presser feet and auto bobbin thread winder.
    Since many of the people that work in these stores sew as well
    they would probably have a good knowledge base of who
    can help you with your issue. Macpherson Nottingham in the United Kingdom opened a sales company of
    textile machinery and accessories – Geoffrey E.

  36. It's so interesting

  37. PoofShesGone says:

    This explains everything. Ever wonder why on earth Poof'sBitch® comments the way he does? Why he repeats himself endlessly, why he tells lies and then lies when it's proven he's lying, why he's so obsessed with responding to every comment even though it was truly none of his business, why he insults constantly? It's all part of RogerGame — his burning need to reach "lofty" goals for himself — to have the most comments ever on IntenseDebate and to have the highest 'score'.

    93 weeks ago @ – growl · 5 replies · 0 points
    You're the one with a quota:

    Roger 166p • 2 days ago
    And when would I want to do other comments? It would cost me the total I'm working towards on my profile.

    • Roger is the Devil says:

      He really said that? That proves he is what he accuses everyone else of.

      • PoofShesGone says:

        It kinda all makes sense now, doesn't it?

      • Roger says:

        No, it only shows that I don't bother with fake guest profiles as the posse trolls do.
        Joe, it shows that while you complain about my total of comments I at least don't sneak around under fake names like you do.

        • PoofShesGone says:


        • Guest says:

          You can't reply to every comment that is made when guest profiles are used Satan

          • Roger says:

            If someone spilled Holy Water on you, would you melt like the wicked witch?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You would die from holy water Satan

          • Roger says:

            I don't think so. I know so, and at least you realize Holy Water is dangerous. Did you learn that by watching the wicked witch melt?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            It is dangerous to you Satan

            Sent from Gods Samsung's Galaxy 5S

          • Roger says:

            Do you grind down the horns before going in for a haircut?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Be gone Satan Roger

          • Roger says:

            Sounds like you just can't stand people that think and understand complex issues.

            The posse? You're not so complex.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            We all know you can't.

          • Roger says:

            Did they help you put that sentence together?

            Go back and eat more of your macaroni art.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I have to use small words for you to understand

          • Roger says:

            There you go again, having someone help you use a big word.

            Wow, do you get a participation award for that?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Those were all small words, you thought they were big

          • Roger says:

            Understand is way past your normal abilities. It's got like (holding up both hands) that many letters!

          • PoofShesGone says:

            And now we know why he doesn't use guest profiles — that would cut into his game plan to have the most comments ever made on IntenseDebate. That's his only goal and it's obvious it's been his goal for years. Imagine having THAT on your bucket list instead of getting laid on some exotic beach or in a beautiful forest or seeing the Grand Canyon or visiting the Smithsonian or riding the Orient Express or going on safari or walking your daughter down the aisle….some people have some pretty screwed-up priorities.

          • Roger says:

            Now we know why you bother with guest profiles.
            You don't want to leave a trail.

            It's been the posse goal for years, to come and go like a bad odor with no way of proving who left it.

          • PoofShesGone says:


          • Roger says:

            And all because I was not ashamed of my comments and am willing to defend them, so I don't have to hide like a cockroach, as most in your posse do.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Most narcissistic bitches are not ashamed of their sexist comments

          • Roger says:

            Saggy doesn't seem to be.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Not sure who Saggy is you narcissistic POS

          • Roger says:

            Poor saggy, and here she is a legend in her own mind.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I Dont see any profiles named saggy. You must be using derogatory comments Satan

          • Roger says:

            You only know and see what the posse allows you to know and see.

            Check for the fishy smell down at the beach, I think they're rolling her back out to sea.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I see everything and frankly your sexist comments are disgusting. If she was my wife and you try talked that way to her I would be in jail and you in the hospital. It would be worth it

          • Roger says:

            Why, that pretends saggy is a typical female, or it's her femininity that I attack. She doesn't seem to have any.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Nah, its nice to be able to leave comments you can't track

          • Roger says:

            The saggy one must be so proud of you, more posse guest trolls.

            Why do you feel so ashamed of your comments that you don't want them traceable?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            As I have said several times I don't want you tracking them

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Hey — if you need to know how to get an account "frozen for safe-keeping", let me know.

          • Roger says:

            Hey, if you know how to troll and spam you're probably part of the posse.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            What a sad life and sad goals. The Satan in strong in this bitch named Roger

          • PoofShesGone says:

            I don't think it's sad at all. He's made conscious decisions to play his little RogerGame, he's living with his choices but they were, in fact, choices made of free will. I've always found him to be dishonest and I still do, but realizing what he's up to makes me know that he's dishonest about everything….I look to every single comment he makes as a flat-out lie of some sort just to further his agenda of making the most comments and having the highest score. He played everyone very well to that end, even to the point of suing those he was playing. That's not sad, it's unethical and class-less and despicable.

          • Roger says:

            Poor saggy.

            Still pretending I lie? Still not offering any proof of anything? You don't have the credibility outside the posse to make those calls with any impact.

            Saggy, you are sad, and of course class less and despicable. It must be hard knowing you deserve what people say about you.

          • PoofShesGone says:


          • Roger says:

            And you still have nothing.

            Want some suggestions?

            Try to be polite.
            Have something that you really want discussed.
            Lay out why it's important.
            Attack a link to support your position if possible.

          • PoofShesGone says:


          • Roger says:

            Poor saggy. You sure do seem hung up on numbers. As hung up as you are on the bitter angry feelings that seem to have replaced your personality.

          • Smith says:

            Physician, heal thyself.

          • Roger says:

            Say that a couple thousand times. You're too far gone, hut it will keep you busy so that adults can discuss the stories again.

        • Smith says:

          Check this out. roger has spent weeks talking smack about "Joe Allen". Just a few short hours from this comment he apparently realizes that Alinsky, the left nut to roger's right nut, has completely conned him. Wonder how much roger had to pay to learn that he was acting the fool.

          Well played, "Joe".

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, don't forget you are identified as alinsky under this guest name since you used your jamal talk on it before.

            And You still keep making those little mistakes that make one small step at a time towards your front door.

          • Smith says:

            History has shown you will believe what you want, no matter how wrong.

            Are you going to tell your little playmates at CVN how you got played? You were all too happy to tell them about Joe Allen, even those most of them could care less about you or your childish games.

          • Roger says:

            History has shown that I'm focused and patient and when I get my chance I chew up people that think I'm harmless, if they deserve it.

          • PoofShesGone says:


          • Roger says:

            The number of things pulled from you neck?

          • Smith says:

            You are a legend in your own mind.

          • Roger says:

            At least I have one Alinsky.

            Is it time for you to go find more Chinese ISP's?

          • trustfunded says:

            You want to chew up men you meet online? Then what, spit them out? Ewww…..

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Is "chew" a euphemism for other mouth-related stuff? Ewwwww………..his constant sexual innuendos are really crossing the line lately and are so obvious. "The gaydar is strong with this one!"

          • Roger says:

            You would be the expert on that, but I bet you had to pay quite a lot.

            With your saggy looks and lack of personality it's just the way you should expect it.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Have any examples or are you making things up again Satan?

            Sent from Gods phone

          • Roger says:

            Still cranky from grinding the horns down?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            So nothing……….

            You lied again. Satan Roger lies.

          • Roger says:

            So, nothing? Still spamming the site?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You law suit failed

          • Roger says:

            Did it? Have WTE explain why, why don't you?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Who is that? Someone you made up? Got their contact information? I suppose you are full of chit again

          • Roger says:

            Still the clueless troll hiding behind the community Chinese ISP addresses?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Face it you made that up to pretend you are a big shot. Is it hot on hell Satan?

          • Roger says:

            Face it, you're the coward cockroach.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You're a coward turd who sues people

          • Roger says:

            Coward? Am I the one hiding behind anonymous Chinese ISP's?

            Am I the one posting from an anonymous guest profile?

            You're the coward turd by your own standards.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            I saw that, it cracked me up. And no, he won't be going around to other sites where he announced flamboyantly all his great detective skills in 'outing' Joe Allen….he's too much a pansy to ever admit when he's wrong, and he's too much a wimp to acknowledge his lies. He still has a chance, albeit slim, to retract the libelous, defaming comments he made about Peter Elliott, but for some reason he seems to believe that's all water under the bridge.

          • Roger says:

            Still flamboyantly saggy? Still proud that the posse can lie and hide?

            That says a lot about you as a group, and sadly you all think it's cute and clever.

          • trustfunded says:

            I think it's cute and not so clever that you waste your time and money chasing ghosts.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Is it really his money? I think he's one of those who rags about others who are recipients of entitlement programs but does the exact same thing. Ever notice he's rarely away from his computer more than about 3 hours? Know of any 2.5-hour work shifts with legitimate employers? Even McD's has 4-hour shifts.

          • Roger says:

            Is it really your insults? is it really your talking points?

            Saggy, if you held two jobs and worked as hard as you pretend you'd have disposable income too.

          • Roger says:

            You don't think. You spam from a a funded work terminal.

          • trustfunded says:

            Still funding your lawyers?

          • Roger says:

            Still getting to spam from a funded work terminal?

          • trustfunded says:

            No, my spam filter works great, thanks.

          • Roger says:

            It lets spam out. It needs to be adjusted.

          • trustfunded says:

            The real Joe Allen should sue him. Anyone know Joe Allen's email address?

          • PoofShesGone says:

            This might work:

          • trustfunded says:

            Thank you. I'm sure Joe would like to know that Roger Russell has been defaming him with hundreds of comments, unprovoked.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Maybe the real Joe Allen could use a good attorney. I'll bet Peter Rodger knows of one.

          • trustfunded says:

            Or at least Roger knows one to avoid.

          • Roger says:

            I bet that Joe Allen should sue alinsky for impersonation.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I bet it upsets you that you think you had him and spent all that money for nothing. You seen to think you are untouchable for your actions. Well you're not and karma is coming for you Satan

          • Roger says:

            I bet it upsets you to have to bother when most sites just fold up.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            huh? Please try and make sense

          • Roger says:

            Why, you don't.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Yes I do

          • Roger says:

            Not here on these forums.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Everyone else understands

          • Roger says:

            The posse? Yes, they understand the agenda is to stop reasonable discussion. So, you don't have to make sense.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            If there ever was an agenda (which there never has been), it would be to expose you as the phucking nut bag, or bag of phucking nuts, you are. Thanks for providing 162,340 pieces of evidence to prove how phucking crazy you are.

          • Roger says:

            Of course there has been.
            Media matters really should do an article on the dedicated fools that spend days and days saying nothing with no credit or people to sing their praises.

            Of course that would leave out that your ideology is failed and everyone will suffer if you succeed at silencing voices of reason. Like Scalia. A voice of reason that understands the constitution and the thinking behind it.

            You'd want to take him out of the debate, wouldn't you saggy?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Yep the real Joe needs contacted.

          • Roger says:

            I bet the real Joe may not appreciate Alinsky dragging him into the debate.

          • trustfunded says:

            Only one of us convinced themselves who Alinsky is.

            Sent from Roger McDonkey's Samsung Galaxy S3 device.

          • Roger says:

            Only one of us bothers to post comments with content.

            The work terminal funded for your spam all day long is a tip off which of us it is.

          • trustfunded says:

            Your content includes libeling a man you've never interacted with. Congratulations.

          • Roger says:

            Do they? Or was it Alinsky impersonating someone?

            Congratulations, Alinsky once more ignores the reality and blindly pushes the posse agenda.

            Liberalism, ignoring results and tactics for the agenda.

          • trustfunded says:

            No, it was you libeling. Posting links to his videos and articles he wrote. Trashing his book that you never read. Calling him all kinds of horrible names. Yes, that was you. I believe he should know the things you have been saying and the rumors you have been spreading all over the internet. You may have caused lost future earnings to a REAL author.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            I couldn't tell from your profile if you were talking about Joe Allen or Peter Rodger. He's libeled both, he's defamed both (and Rodger is mega-wealthy, the defamation has the potential of costing Smeggie millions!). He's stuck with the Rodger lie for 4 months and it hasn't gone unnoticed. How long do you think he'll stick with the Joe Allen lie? With 162,142 comments and counting, the dweeb has set himself up for a couple of VERY expensive lawsuits. Paybacks are a bitch.

          • Roger says:

            You can't tell a lot of things saggy.

            Gravity, the gravity of the situation must make it difficult for you to roll around in your chair.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Or appreciate you defaming him for weeks

          • Roger says:

            Or him being impersonated by such a lame hack….

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I went through his comment stream. No where does he impersonate anyone named Joe

          • Roger says:

            You were the one impersonating him Alinsky.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            I am not Alinsky

          • Roger says:

            Sure you are, (not just the dumb ass part).

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Nope, you're the dumb bitch for thinking I am though

          • Roger says:

            Not really, if the shoe fits she is probably in the corner chewing on it.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Hilarious to see the jerk who libeled and defamed Peter Rodger mouthing off about Alinsky/Joe Allen, when it's been Smeggie who defamed Joe Allen. Those Carson City attorneys of his sure aren't very good at shutting him up, are they? Oh, wait — maybe their newest plan is to defend him against the lawsuits that are headed his way. No John Does this time, "Roger Russell"….straight from his Amazon account. Fool.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            What do you expect? He said the Nazis were successful.

          • Roger says:

            What do you expect? I said what I said.

            Can't actually debate the issue? Oh, you must be a troll here to stop debate then.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You said the Nazis were successful. They were not

          • Roger says:

            Tell that to 6 millions Jews.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You call murdering 6 million people successful? Phuck you

          • Roger says:

            For the Germans they felt it was a success of sorts.

            I never said I consider it a success. Screw you and the liberal hacks that back you.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Back tracking I see you sad pathetic anti-Semite. I hope you burn in hell

          • Roger says:

            Why does the posse take a statement, pretend it says something it doesn't then get mad when I slowly explain in small words why you're just spamming as a troll?

          • Roger says:

            Hilarious to see the saggy old thing who can't make a civil comment pretending to lecture on manners!

            Those support garments can only be expected to do so much….

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            That's a good idea

          • Roger says:

            If you like it, it's not a good idea.

          • Smith says:

            Nah. One, Joe Allen would have to be a real loser to sue over something said in these forums. Only a loser would do such a thing. Two, I'll bet roger isn't competent to stand trial.

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, did it dawn on you that Joe Allen may not be happy you impersonated him?

          • trustfunded says:

            Pretty sure he won't like what you've said about him, Obama, Sinclair, etc….

          • Roger says:

            Pretty sure he would have wanted Alinsky to defend him better if he was going to pretend he was a real person.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Apparently it hasn't dawned on KingTroll that it wasn't Alinsky who libeled Joe Allen. Or Peter Rodger.

          • Roger says:

            Apparently it hasn't dawned on the queen troll that Joe may not like being impersonated.

            Saggy, is it time for them to roll you back out to sea again?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            He never impersonated him though. You still had no right to defame Joe Allen. You're a phucking idiot

          • Roger says:

            He did though, he even explained the book cover design of Joe's.

          • trustfunded says:

            Book cover design……a building. Roger, such a moron.

          • Roger says:

            That wasn't the book or the cover I was referring to.

            Go back and get new talking points.

          • trustfunded says:

            Oh you mean Dallas Billionaires? I wouldn't know about that.

          • Roger says:

            Then why does it seem to excite you almost as much as it does alinsky?

            I'm still not interested.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Explaining is not impersonation

          • Roger says:

            Using generalized labels isn't illegal.

            Joe is a very common name and there is more than one Joe Allen.

            How can you prove the comments that were accurate but not liked were actually about you in particular or Joe in particular?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:


          • Roger says:

            Still don't have a clue, do you?

            All these brave empty words, threatening comments about my head and eye sockets and you don't have a clue.

            LIberalism. You're all clueless.

          • Roger says:

            Still clueless?

            Just how much have you self medicated today? Hmmmmm?

            6 weeks ago @ – Cain's Response To Cha… · 1 reply · 0 points
            "Why do you keep asking me how much marijuana I smoke? I told you, I smoke a lot everyday, but I don't know the exact amount of grams….."

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Roger won't explain this comment.

            He is in a lot of trouble for making death threats and subpoenaing random people, intruding on their lives.

            He is trying to cover it up by making up gibberish like this…can anyone decipher what he was trying to say?

            "Using generalized labels isn't illegal.

            Joe is a very common name and there is more than one Joe Allen.

            How can you prove the comments that were accurate but not liked were actually about you in particular or Joe in particular?"

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, you won't explain why my comment is wrong.
            You are in a lot of trouble, that's why you hide like a scum sucking cockroach. You just defamed me by making spurious claims not backed up by my actual comments.

            Are you trying to cover up by hiding behind yet another communist Chinese ISP?

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            Still waiting for Roger to explain what that comment was supposed to mean, if it wasn't just gibberish, as it seems to be.

            He is angry, bitter, readuy to kill.

            He got caught reading romance novels with shirtless men on the covers, so we know he is gay as f u ck.

            We found out he made less than % dollars suing Wee, and that was after spending thousands on a lawyer and PI.

            And now we learn he was libeling Joe Allen, spending even more money subpoenaing his phone records, and all for nothing.

            His lawyer must be ready to drop him.

          • Roger says:

            Alinsky, you won't explain why my comment is wrong.
            You are in a lot of trouble, that's why you hide like a scum sucking cockroach. You just defamed me by making spurious claims not backed up by my actual comments.

            Are you trying to cover up by hiding behind yet another communist Chinese ISP?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            You were specific in your comments

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            "generalized labels isn't illegal"

            WTF does that mean? It's just gibberish. He made it up.

            He was caught libeling Joe Allen, and now he is in meltdown mode trying to get out of all the trouble he is in.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            It was only a matter of time before karma came to get him

          • Roger says:

            I hope I'm there to see karma bit you.
            And my comment is enough to drive you nuts, so it has to mean something even if you won't admit it.

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Karma is going to "bit" me? I have done nothing wrong. Like I said you think you are untouchable out there in Carson City. You have no idea what is coming

          • Roger says:

            It doesn't want to actually bite you since it doesn't know where you've been.

            And I have an idea what you can expect if you try.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            He doesn't seem so good at the whole litigation thingy.

          • Roger says:

            I don't have to be, that's why I have a great legal team.

            Watching one mistake at a time….

          • TheRealJoeAllen says:

            Then why did they harass me and cause me so much emotional trauma at my Chicago home?

          • Roger says:

            Joe, (Alinsky), what did I say that was incorrect?

            Are you not a Chicago area communist writing for all those sites?

            Dont' blame me if your own life has distressed you.

          • TheRealJoeAllen says:

            Why did you get a subpoena for my phone records?

          • Roger says:

            Why not ask my attorney?

          • Roger is the Devil says:

            Not at all. He is a phucking punk bitch

          • Roger says:

            You talking about saggy again? I though saggy was female?

          • PoofShesGone says:

            Karma had nothing to do with it. He got hit by the PhuckingNutsFairy. He's not just stupid, he's crazy.

          • Roger says:

            Saggy, I'd have to think God sent gravity to piss off older cranky shrews that deserve to look bad.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            So the phucking nut case thinks "God sent gravity" — that's the 162,339th bit o' proof you're a phucking nut case crazy man.

          • Roger says:

            Are you flopping around trying to walk down the hall without body parts hiding both sides?

            No wonder everyone has time to get away from you saggy. That and the flies tip them off.

          • trustfunded says:

            You are the one that will be required to provide proof that Joe Allen, the author who you've linked to several times, is a "sexual deviant" as you've called him dozens of times.

          • Roger says:

            Will I?

            Because a troll sitting at a funded work terminal used that for talking points?

            Yeah, can't you get saggy's leash and give her a walk, she seems rather nervous.

  38. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    Hillary Clinton HERO

    Check out the clip at the 2:40 mark

  39. PoofShesGone says:

    So let's see here — Poof'sBitch® danced all over the conservative sites a while back, telling all who'd listen about his crack detective skills in figuring out that Alinsky was "Joe Allen", some unknown Chicagoan whose very existence is some kind of threat to the United States. He's been calling Alinsky Joe constantly ever since, being his normal ridiculous, repetitive self. And then today he admits he was DEAD WRONG….and he probably wasted even more of those big lawsuit winnings he sucked out of Wee to get subpoenas and pay yet more in attorney fees.

    "3 hours ago @ Storyleak – Are You Living in a Fo… · 4 replies · -2 points
    Why did you pretend to be Joe Allen. He says he doesn't have a Samsung S4 phone. In fact his carrier says they don't handle any accounts under his name. Want to try again Alinsky? So, what is the weather like in the Boston area?"

    So when is Poof'sBitch® going back to those sites and wipe the egg off his face and admit he was wrong? I'm sure they'd love to hear about it….it was the subject of discussion from the likes of HighPlainsDripper, 4Constipation, TopSnot and others, with Poof'sBitch® spoon-feeding them his crap. I'd bet dollars to donuts he won't man up.

    • Alinsky Hero USA says:


      I was wondering why he kept calling me Joe., and then stopped yesterday. He seemed so sad.

      Sent from Roger Russell's Hurt Butt Hole FU2

      • PoofShesGone says:

        I prefer to believe you demonstrated the PHUCKING FINEST maneuver ever and I bow down to you!!

        Sent from the owner of Poof'sBitch®, Kari Hartwell of Boring, Oregon via her iPhone5

        • Alinsky Hero USA says:

          I'm writing a book about it called "Roger's Ass Wasn't Meant to Burn So Badly"

          It will, of course, have a super hot shirtless guy on the cover.,

          • PoofShesGone says:

            What a coincidence. Roger is currently on page 16,202 of his upcoming book, "I Am The Grand Wizard Of Intense Debate Trolling".<—The abidged paperback version will only contain 100,000 of his comments but it will still be an excellent sleep aid for insomniacs and can be used to swat spiders with.

          • Alinsky Hero USA says:

            I actually read the first draft of that book.

            Spoiler Alert!

            It turns out he is gay and really was a virgin the whole time.

          • PoofShesGone says:

            I tried to read the past 4 months of stuff, but it was soooo repetitious I kept dozing off. Although in the middle of it all I ran into over 200 comments about a young boy masturbating….he devoted a lot of time/effort into those 200+ comments and I'd bet he'll make that a separate chapter. But for the most part all 162,202 comments so far are just Poof'sBitch®'s run-of-the-mill trolling. I guess since he stated his real goal on Intense Debate is to up his comment count regardless of content, there's gonna be page after page of mindless drivel. *sigh*

          • Roger says:

            Only posse trolls think that hiding and saying things that can't be defended is something to be proud of.

            Saggy, no wonder people avoid you and say things about you behind your back.

      • Roger is the Devil says:

        Hats off to you sir.

  40. trustfunded says:

    I'm glad I don't have to worry about this. I gave up the on technology and have been doing without it for a couple years now. No cell phone, no computer, nothing and my life has been so enriched ever since.

  41. gaby de wilde says:

    golden lining!

  42. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    This is funny. A process server trying to figure out how a Samsung Galaxy S4 phone is traced. And fails!!!!!

    Roger has been served right up his ass!

  43. Alinsky Hero USA says:

    Roger's process server/PI

    This cost him $2000.

  44. TheRealJoeAllen says:

    Has anyone seen my Samsung Galaxy S4?

  45. TheRealJoeAllen says:

    Roger and his legal team …

  46. PoofShesGone says:

    WARNING!! Do not, I repeat DO NOT use any of the following words and/or phrases to wish Cap'nKhakiPants well: break a leg, good luck, bonne chance, sretno, sterkte, fortuna, fat i mirë, حظا سعيدا, zorte ona, সৌভাগ্য, hodně štěstí, veel geluk, Viel Erfolg, καλή τύχη, buona fortuna, lykke til, buena suerte.

    If you do use one of these words/phrases, it will be assumed by the good Cap'n that you've threatened to cause him physical harm and he intends to use deadly force for self-defense. OK, don't say you haven't been warned — there are crazy people out there in the world, and one of them commen….never mind.

  47. I like this very much,very good post.
    very nice post brother, hopefully it's news can be received by many people.
    اجمل العاب الفلاش الاون لاين العاب جميلة جدا العبها الان علي موقع العاب رعد
    لينكات موصي بيها مع اجمل العاب فلاش اون لاين بدون تحميل علي اللينكات التالية

    لعبة صب واي




    العاب سيارات

    لعبة البيرة

    لعبة ماريو

    لعبة من سيربح المليون

    لعبة زوما

    لعبة الفراخ

    play and engoy

  48. The fact of the matter is that if we allow the DHS to trample over the Fourth Amendment through suspicionless searches, it is inevitable that they will push even harder in their next policy update.

  49. Nice article. Think so new form of features have included in your article. Waiting for your next article..

  50. Anju Rai says:

    Thank you! It was a wonderful chance to visit this kind of site. I hope you will publish more on this topic. Thanks a lot for sharing with us!

  51. XNXX says:

    I'm all for legitimate property rights, but we can't sacrifice our privacy to protect our property rights. We can't allow the authorities to go on endless fishing expeditions. The probable cause standard was created by the founders for very good reasons.

  52. xnxx says:

    Keeping in this mind, we have optimized our XNXX website, so that it can be accessed through the mobile phones and PDA’s too. You can surf our website on your mobile phone without any difficult. You can now download, watch or share porn videos on your phone too. You can surf our website with privacy and safely, without knowing anyone. For this you need to activate the privacy option in your browser. In this way no one will ever know that you have visited our website. So, visit our webpage XNXX again and again to get the best out of our collection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *